tessl install github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill exa-architecture-variantsChoose and implement Exa validated architecture blueprints for different scales. Use when designing new Exa integrations, choosing between monolith/service/microservice architectures, or planning migration paths for Exa applications. Trigger with phrases like "exa architecture", "exa blueprint", "how to structure exa", "exa project layout", "exa microservice".
Review Score
78%
Validation Score
13/16
Implementation Score
65%
Activation Score
90%
Three validated architecture blueprints for Exa integrations.
Best for: MVPs, small teams, < 10K daily active users
my-app/
├── src/
│ ├── exa/
│ │ ├── client.ts # Singleton client
│ │ ├── types.ts # Types
│ │ └── middleware.ts # Express middleware
│ ├── routes/
│ │ └── api/
│ │ └── exa.ts # API routes
│ └── index.ts
├── tests/
│ └── exa.test.ts
└── package.json// Direct integration in route handler
app.post('/api/create', async (req, res) => {
try {
const result = await exaClient.create(req.body);
res.json(result);
} catch (error) {
res.status(500).json({ error: error.message });
}
});Best for: Growing startups, 10K-100K DAU, multiple integrations
my-app/
├── src/
│ ├── services/
│ │ ├── exa/
│ │ │ ├── client.ts # Client wrapper
│ │ │ ├── service.ts # Business logic
│ │ │ ├── repository.ts # Data access
│ │ │ └── types.ts
│ │ └── index.ts # Service exports
│ ├── controllers/
│ │ └── exa.ts
│ ├── routes/
│ ├── middleware/
│ ├── queue/
│ │ └── exa-processor.ts # Async processing
│ └── index.ts
├── config/
│ └── exa/
└── package.json// Service layer abstraction
class ExaService {
constructor(
private client: ExaClient,
private cache: CacheService,
private queue: QueueService
) {}
async createResource(data: CreateInput): Promise<Resource> {
// Business logic before API call
const validated = this.validate(data);
// Check cache
const cached = await this.cache.get(cacheKey);
if (cached) return cached;
// API call with retry
const result = await this.withRetry(() =>
this.client.create(validated)
);
// Cache result
await this.cache.set(cacheKey, result, 300);
// Async follow-up
await this.queue.enqueue('exa.post-create', result);
return result;
}
}Best for: Enterprise, 100K+ DAU, strict SLAs
exa-service/ # Dedicated microservice
├── src/
│ ├── api/
│ │ ├── grpc/
│ │ │ └── exa.proto
│ │ └── rest/
│ │ └── routes.ts
│ ├── domain/
│ │ ├── entities/
│ │ ├── events/
│ │ └── services/
│ ├── infrastructure/
│ │ ├── exa/
│ │ │ ├── client.ts
│ │ │ ├── mapper.ts
│ │ │ └── circuit-breaker.ts
│ │ ├── cache/
│ │ ├── queue/
│ │ └── database/
│ └── index.ts
├── config/
├── k8s/
│ ├── deployment.yaml
│ ├── service.yaml
│ └── hpa.yaml
└── package.json
other-services/
├── order-service/ # Calls exa-service
├── payment-service/
└── notification-service/// Event-driven with domain isolation
class ExaAggregate {
private events: DomainEvent[] = [];
process(command: ExaCommand): void {
// Domain logic
const result = this.execute(command);
// Emit domain event
this.events.push(new ExaProcessedEvent(result));
}
getUncommittedEvents(): DomainEvent[] {
return [...this.events];
}
}
// Event handler
@EventHandler(ExaProcessedEvent)
class ExaEventHandler {
async handle(event: ExaProcessedEvent): Promise<void> {
// Saga orchestration
await this.sagaOrchestrator.continue(event);
}
}| Factor | Monolith | Service Layer | Microservice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team Size | 1-5 | 5-20 | 20+ |
| DAU | < 10K | 10K-100K | 100K+ |
| Deployment Frequency | Weekly | Daily | Continuous |
| Failure Isolation | None | Partial | Full |
| Operational Complexity | Low | Medium | High |
| Time to Market | Fastest | Moderate | Slowest |
Monolith → Service Layer:
1. Extract Exa code to service/
2. Add caching layer
3. Add background processing
Service Layer → Microservice:
1. Create dedicated exa-service repo
2. Define gRPC contract
3. Add event bus
4. Deploy to Kubernetes
5. Migrate traffic graduallyUse the decision matrix to identify appropriate variant.
Select Monolith, Service Layer, or Microservice based on needs.
Set up project layout following the chosen blueprint.
Document upgrade path for future scaling.
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Over-engineering | Wrong variant choice | Start simpler |
| Performance issues | Wrong layer | Add caching/async |
| Team friction | Complex architecture | Simplify or train |
| Deployment complexity | Microservice overhead | Consider service layer |
# Count team size and DAU to select variant
echo "Team: $(git log --format='%ae' | sort -u | wc -l) developers"
echo "DAU: Check analytics dashboard"For common anti-patterns, see exa-known-pitfalls.