Write or audit AI agent system prompts component-by-component across identity, instruction architecture, behavioral constraints, tools, examples, context strategy, output format, and error handling. Use when the user wants to design a new agent prompt, write a system prompt, review an existing agent prompt, fix tool-use instructions, audit prompt structure, improve context strategy, tune output formats, or define error handling for single-agent or multi-agent systems.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.33xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines a specific domain (AI agent system prompt engineering), enumerates concrete components and actions, and provides comprehensive trigger guidance via an explicit 'Use when...' clause. It uses proper third-person voice throughout and covers both single-agent and multi-agent scenarios, making it highly distinctive and actionable for skill selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and domains: 'Write or audit AI agent system prompts component-by-component across identity, instruction architecture, behavioral constraints, tools, examples, context strategy, output format, and error handling.' This enumerates eight distinct components, making the capabilities very concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (write or audit AI agent system prompts component-by-component across eight named areas) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause listing eight specific trigger scenarios including designing, writing, reviewing, fixing, auditing, improving, tuning, and defining). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes a rich set of natural keywords users would say: 'system prompt', 'agent prompt', 'tool-use instructions', 'prompt structure', 'context strategy', 'output formats', 'error handling', 'multi-agent systems', 'design a new agent prompt', 'review an existing agent prompt'. These cover many natural variations of how users would phrase requests. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The niche is very specific — AI agent system prompt engineering — with distinct triggers like 'agent prompt', 'system prompt', 'tool-use instructions', 'prompt structure', and 'multi-agent systems'. This is unlikely to conflict with general coding, writing, or document skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that efficiently encodes a complex prompt engineering methodology into a compact, actionable format. The component pass table with required anchors is particularly well-designed, providing concrete guidance without over-explaining. The dual output contracts (write vs audit) with specific section requirements and the constraint rewrite patterns give Claude everything needed to execute without wasted tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient throughout. It assumes Claude's competence with prompt engineering concepts, avoids explaining what system prompts or agents are, and uses compressed table format for the component pass. Every section earns its place with no padding or unnecessary exposition. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete guidance: specific component anchors with exact phrasing patterns, constraint rewrite examples with before/after text, tool description templates, audit finding patterns with priority/section/risk/rewrite structure, and a complete mini output example showing the expected deliverable format. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced (First Actions → Component Pass → Multi-agent check → Review → Delivery) with explicit validation at step 4 (every component addressed, output contract complete, gaps converted to assumptions). The expansion rule provides a clear decision framework for when to go deeper. The output contracts for both write and audit modes serve as checklists. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a standalone skill with no bundle, the content is well-organized with clear sections that progressively build from workflow overview to component details to output contracts to patterns. The table format for the component pass keeps the overview scannable while the Patterns section provides deeper examples. No external references are needed given the skill's scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents