Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A richly specified, well-sequenced DTO-generation workflow with strong validation checkpoints, undermined by verbosity from repeated policy guidance and a real gap: the examples/ code templates it depends on are not bundled. Tightening the duplicated asking-rules and providing the missing example files would lift the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the AskUserQuestion / 'context first, then ask' guidance — state it once in the Decision-making principle and reference it from Steps 0–5 instead of restating the batching rules four times.
Bundle the examples/_skeletons/ and examples/_fragments/ files the skill reads from (or relocate that content into references/), since 'Code ONLY from examples/ files' is unfulfillable without them and caps actionability.
Consider moving the large per-field options and indentation sections into a reference file so the SKILL.md body stays a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~510 lines with significant policy repetition — the AskUserQuestion/batching rules and 'context first, then ask' guidance are restated in the Defaults section, the Decision-making principle, Step 0, and again in 'How to ask' — so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened considerably. It does correctly avoid explaining concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a DTO' filler). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete (exact MCP tool names, derived-variable tables, decision matrices, FQN/import substitution rules), but the skill mandates 'Code ONLY from examples/ files' and repeatedly reads from examples/_skeletons/ and examples/_fragments/ — yet no examples/ tree exists in the bundle (only references/), so the executable templates the workflow depends on are missing key details. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–7 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — the anti-hallucination checklist, 'If no matching example -- STOP and ask user', and per-step generation order give a clear, recoverable process for a fragile code-generation task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Variant details are well split into one-level-deep reference files (java-plain/java-record/java-lombok/kotlin/sub-dto/validation, all present and signaled), but the body also references an examples/_skeletons/ and examples/_fragments/ tree that is absent from the bundle — references are present but a referenced path tree is missing rather than clearly organized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |