Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable conversational workflow with clear sequencing, validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. The main area for improvement is tightening the per-level prompt lists and parallel agent blocks to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient procedural prose with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows, but the per-experience-level prompt-question lists and two fully-spelled-out parallel agent-invocation blocks could be tightened without losing meaning. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete prompts, exact file paths, structured agent-invocation templates with labeled context blocks, specific user-facing error messages, and a mkdir command give copy-ready, executable guidance throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are explicitly sequenced with branching (upgrade vs. fresh), readiness checks, an iterative refine/re-invoke feedback loop, and an overwrite confirmation checkpoint via AskUserQuestion for the file write. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (blockquoted 'Read' callouts to infra-change-spec-template.md and blast-radius-guide.md, both present in ./references/), keeping detail offloaded rather than inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |