Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable multi-step pipeline with clear validation feedback loops and properly split references. The only weakness is minor verbosity and a duplicated cost-analyst dispatch block.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the arn-infra-cost-analyst dispatch instruction in Step 6 (Level 2) — the same Task-tool/model-fallback sentence is written twice in consecutive lines (233-235); keep one instance.
Tighten the Prerequisites extraction list by collapsing near-identical 'path to X' entries into a single 'config file paths' bullet referencing the resolved values, reducing token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but padded in places — the arn-infra-cost-analyst dispatch instruction is restated twice in Step 6 (lines 233-235), and some orchestration prose could be tightened without losing meaning. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (tofu validate, az bicep build, kubectl apply --dry-run=client), exact glob patterns, and copy-ready specialist-agent prompt templates with delimited context blocks. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — 'If validation fails at any level: Present the errors with fix suggestions. Offer to auto-fix and re-validate' — appropriate for risky IaC operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references — 8 pattern files cited via blockquotes and an IaC-tool table — all of which exist in references/; content is appropriately split out of the overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |