Conciseness

Mostly efficient and procedural (no padding with concepts Claude already knows), but it runs ~640 lines and the 'Agent Invocation Guide' and 'Error Handling' sections substantially restate the inline workflow, plus long verbatim user-facing dialogs; this matches 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean top anchor, and is not level 1 because it avoids concept explanation.

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance — the Bash command `echo $CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS`, exact output paths like `prototypes/clickable/v[N]/app/` and `prototypes/clickable/reviews/round-N-strategist-review.md`, named agents invoked via the Task tool with specified context, and copy-ready AskUserQuestion prompts; fully actionable even though it is instruction-based rather than code-based.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 9-step process with sub-steps and Phases 1–4, plus explicit validation checkpoints (Step 5d threshold check, Step 6 independent judge gate) and feedback loops (fail -> next cycle, judge FAIL -> more cycles, Agent Teams file-existence verification, builder retry up to 3 times); matches the anchor requiring explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops.

Progressive Disclosure

Clean one-level-deep bundle: the three reference files (debate-protocol.md, expert-interaction-review-template.md, debate-review-report-template.md) are real and clearly signaled via 'Read' directives, and the heavy material (debate protocol, report/review templates) is appropriately externalized; matches the well-signaled one-level-deep anchor rather than the monolithic/nested anchor below.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'create a clickable interactive prototype with linked screens', 'validate it through iterative expert debate cycles', 'Playwright-based interaction testing', 'per-criterion scoring', 'an independent judge verdict', and 'versioned output' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor; not the level below because it goes well beyond naming a single domain and a couple of actions.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('create a clickable interactive prototype with linked screens and validate it through iterative expert debate cycles... combined review') and when ('This skill should be used when the user says... or wants to create...') with explicit triggers; not below because the when-clause is explicit, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural phrases a user would say — 'clickable prototype teams', 'collaborative interaction review', 'review interactions as a team', 'interactive prototype teams', 'team prototype review' — giving good coverage of natural terms; not below because the genuinely natural utterances are present, even though several keyword permutations like 'arn clickable prototype teams' are stuffed.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (debate-based expert review) and explicitly de-conflicts with 'For standard lower-of-two-scores interaction review, use /arn-spark-clickable-prototype instead'; not below because the routing guidance makes overlap with the base skill unlikely.