Conciseness

The body introduces no concept padding Claude already knows, but it is padded with redundancy: the Error Handling section re-covers cases already handled inline (no reports found, rename fails, reject all, write fails) and the Constraints section restates inline statements (only-skill-that-modifies, mandatory gate, preserve template, rename-preserves-original). That matches 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean score-3 anchor; it is not the verbose concept-explaining score-1 case.

Actionability

For an instruction-only orchestration skill the guidance is fully actionable: exact report filenames, exact extraction field lists (row number, section, current state, recommended change, type, rationale), exact AskUserQuestion prompts with option text, and exact Task-tool context templates with the model-parameter source. The scoring note explicitly exempts absence of code when guidance is this concrete.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-8 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints -- a mandatory user approval gate before any write, conflict detection with pillar analysis, and a retry-then-escalate feedback loop for poor strategist consolidation -- matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps and feedback loops' anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that points to two real, one-level-deep bundle files (conflict-resolution-protocol.md and review-report-template.md), both clearly signaled and loaded in Step 1 via ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}; the conflict-resolution detail is split out rather than inlined, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor.

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions -- 'Scans for stress test reports, consolidates recommendations, resolves conflicts using product pillars, presents the full changeset for user approval, and produces an updated product-concept.md alongside a concept-review-report.md' -- matching the score-3 anchor rather than the single-action score-2 example.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (scan/consolidate/resolve/present/produce) and 'when' ('This skill should be used when the user says...'), satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement that would otherwise cap completeness at 2.

Trigger Term Quality

Provides ~9 natural phrases a user would actually say ('concept review', 'review concept', 'update product concept', 'synthesize stress tests', 'stress test review', 'apply stress test findings', 'review stress test results', 'concept update', 'merge stress test recommendations'), giving good coverage rather than the partial score-2 case.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche -- synthesizing completed stress-test findings into a reviewed product concept -- with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for an unrelated skill; not the generic, overlapping score-2 case.