Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clearly sequenced, validation-rich workflow and real, well-signaled reference files. Its weakness is token efficiency: significant content is duplicated across the workflow, invocation table, and error-handling sections, and protocol detail that could live in references is kept inline.
Suggestions
Collapse the Agent Invocation Guide table and Error Handling list into the workflow steps (or move them to a reference file) to remove the substantial duplication of the same scenarios across three sections.
Move the Phase 1–4 debate mechanics and divergence logic into references/debate-protocol.md (already present) and summarize the protocol inline, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.
Tighten the sequential-debate section by removing the in-prose self-correction ('Actually, the full sequential pattern runs as...') and stating the 3-invocation pattern once, definitively.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it repeats substantial material across the Workflow, Agent Invocation Guide table, and Error Handling sections, and contains loose mid-prose self-correction ('Actually, the full sequential pattern runs as...'); it could be tightened, so it is not the lean level-3 but is above the padded level-1. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives fully concrete, executable guidance throughout — named agents, exact Bash commands, file paths to read/write, full AskUserQuestion prompts, and model dispatch conventions — so Claude knows exactly what to do; not the incomplete/pseudocode level-2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced Steps 1–9 with numbered sub-phases and explicit validation checkpoints (verify both Agent Teams review files exist, divergence check, judge pass/fail gate, cycle-budget tracking) plus build→review→fix feedback loops, matching the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to bundle files are real, one level deep, and clearly signaled, but large blocks of protocol logic (divergence handling, Phase 1–4 mechanics) and the duplicated Agent Invocation Guide and Error Handling tables sit inline rather than in separate files, matching the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor; not the monolithic level-1 nor the well-split level-3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |