conflict-analyzer
Identifies and analyzes conflicts in software requirements including logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, and stakeholder priority mismatches. Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts that could block implementation or cause rework. Provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE --skill conflict-analyzer94
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific conflict types, includes natural trigger terms users would actually say, explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it, and carves out a distinct niche in requirements conflict analysis that won't overlap with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'identifies and analyzes conflicts', 'logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, stakeholder priority mismatches', 'provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (identifies/analyzes various conflict types, provides analysis with resolution strategies) AND when ('Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'requirements', 'specifications', 'user stories', 'project plans', 'conflicts', 'contradictions', 'incompatibilities'. These are terms a user would naturally use when needing this skill. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on requirements conflict analysis with distinct triggers like 'requirements', 'specifications', 'user stories', 'conflicts'. Unlikely to conflict with general code review or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-structured skill that provides comprehensive guidance for requirement conflict analysis. The workflow is clear and actionable with excellent examples and templates. The main weakness is moderate verbosity - some sections explain concepts Claude already knows and could be tightened for better token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the 'Core Capabilities' section - it restates what the skill does without adding actionable value
Trim explanatory text in conflict type definitions (e.g., 'Direct contradictions (A says yes, B says no)' is self-evident to Claude)
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is moderately efficient but includes some unnecessary verbosity. The 'Core Capabilities' section restates what the skill does redundantly, and some explanations (like what logical conflicts are) could be trimmed since Claude understands these concepts. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete, actionable guidance with specific examples, structured templates, and clear output formats. The conflict matrix format, severity criteria, and resolution option templates are copy-paste ready and executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Excellent 7-step workflow with clear sequencing from cataloging through reporting. Each step has explicit outputs and the process includes validation through dependency analysis and stakeholder involvement checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections and appropriate references to external files (conflict_patterns.md, resolution_strategies.md, conflict_report_template.json). Content is organized from overview to detailed examples without deep nesting. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.