Content
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured routing skill that is concise and clearly defines ownership boundaries and guardrails. Its main weaknesses are the lack of worked examples for ambiguous routing decisions and the absence of explicit links to the specialist skills it references. Adding a brief decision example and concrete file references would significantly improve actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 worked examples showing ambiguous requests and how the routing decision is made (e.g., 'User asks for a contact form → block-creator if it's a simple form block, plugin-creator if it needs backend email handling').
Add explicit file path references to the specialist skills (e.g., 'See [site-creator/SKILL.md](site-creator/SKILL.md)') so navigation is unambiguous.
Add an explicit step for handling ambiguity: 'If the request could fit multiple paths, ask the user a clarifying question before routing' with example clarifying questions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a clear purpose—ownership, routing rules, guardrails—with no unnecessary explanation of what WordPress is or how plugins work. It respects Claude's intelligence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The routing rules are concrete and specific, providing clear criteria for each path. However, the skill is purely instructional with no examples of ambiguous requests and how they'd be resolved, and the specialist skill names are referenced but not linked or shown in action. It describes routing logic well but lacks worked examples that would make edge cases unambiguous. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is implicitly: assess request → match routing rule → hand off to specialist. However, there's no explicit sequence or decision tree, no guidance on what to do when the user's intent is ambiguous (e.g., ask clarifying questions), and no validation checkpoint before handoff. For a routing/decision skill, a clearer decision flowchart or explicit 'if unclear, ask X' step would improve clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references five specialist skills by name (site-creator, theme-creator, etc.) which implies a well-structured bundle, but no bundle files are provided and there are no explicit links or file paths to these specialist skills. The content itself is well-organized with clear sections, but the navigation to downstream skills is only implied, not clearly signaled with paths or links. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |