blazemeter-api-reference
Comprehensive reference for BlazeMeter REST APIs, including authentication, identifiers, and API endpoints. Use when working with BlazeMeter APIs for (1) Understanding BlazeMeter REST API structure, (2) Authenticating API requests, (3) Obtaining identifiers (Workspace ID, Project ID, Test ID, etc.), (4) Using Test Data API, (5) Using Cloning API, (6) Using Export API, (7) Using Service Virtualization Bulk Operations APIs, or any other API tasks.
54
60%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./resources/skills/blazemeter-api-reference/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that follows best practices closely. It uses third person voice, provides specific concrete actions, includes a clear 'Use when' clause with enumerated trigger scenarios, and is highly distinctive due to its BlazeMeter-specific focus. The only minor concern is the trailing 'or any other API tasks' which is slightly vague, but it doesn't detract meaningfully from the overall quality.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: authentication, obtaining identifiers (with examples like Workspace ID, Project ID, Test ID), Test Data API, Cloning API, Export API, and Service Virtualization Bulk Operations APIs. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (comprehensive reference for BlazeMeter REST APIs including authentication, identifiers, and endpoints) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when working with BlazeMeter APIs for...' clause with a numbered list of trigger scenarios). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'BlazeMeter', 'REST API', 'authentication', 'API requests', 'Workspace ID', 'Project ID', 'Test ID', 'Cloning API', 'Export API', 'Service Virtualization'. These are terms a user working with BlazeMeter APIs would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive due to the specific focus on BlazeMeter APIs. The domain-specific terminology (BlazeMeter, Service Virtualization Bulk Operations, Cloning API) makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
20%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill body is primarily a verbose table of contents and tool catalog rather than actionable guidance. It spends most of its token budget listing MCP tool names and actions that Claude could discover through tool introspection, while providing zero executable examples (no curl commands, no code snippets, no authentication examples). The reference file structure is reasonable but the inline content adds little value beyond navigation.
Suggestions
Add a concrete authentication example (e.g., a curl command with API key header) directly in the Quick Start section instead of deferring everything to reference files.
Remove or drastically condense the MCP Tools section — Claude can discover available tools through tool introspection; at most, include a brief note that MCP tools are available as an alternative to REST APIs.
Add at least one complete, executable API call example (e.g., listing tests or getting a workspace ID) to make the skill immediately actionable.
Remove the 'When to Use Each Reference' section as it nearly duplicates the Reference Files section with minimal added value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The MCP Tools section is extremely verbose, listing every tool, action, and argument in exhaustive detail that Claude could discover through tool usage. The 'When to Use Each Reference' section largely repeats the Reference Files section. The overview and quick start sections add little value beyond restating the table of contents. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There are no concrete code examples, curl commands, or executable snippets anywhere in the skill body. The content describes what APIs exist and what tools are available but never shows how to actually make an API call, authenticate, or use any endpoint. Everything is deferred to reference files. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Example Workflow' section provides a reasonable 4-step sequence for using MCP tools, and the Quick Start lists a logical order. However, there are no validation checkpoints, error handling guidance, or feedback loops for any of the described operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Reference Files section provides well-organized one-level-deep links to detailed content, which is good. However, the massive inline MCP Tools section (which could be its own reference file) undermines the progressive disclosure pattern, and no bundle files were provided to verify the references actually exist. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- Blazemeter/bzm-mcp
- Commit
b76b703
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.