CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

blazemeter-performance-testing

Comprehensive guide for BlazeMeter Performance Testing, including load configuration, reporting, JMeter configuration, Taurus, scenarios, and advanced features. Use when working with Performance tests for (1) Configuring load settings and distribution, (2) Creating and running tests (JMeter, Browser, URL/API, Multi-Test), (3) Analyzing reports and filtering data, (4) Configuring JMeter properties and scenarios, (5) Using Taurus for test configuration, (6) Advanced features (AI Log Analysis, APM Integration, Network Emulation, Mainframe Testing), (7) Troubleshooting test issues, or any other Performance Testing tasks.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./resources/skills/blazemeter-performance-testing/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized index skill with strong progressive disclosure and concrete MCP tool guidance, weakened by redundant reference sections and an absence of validation checkpoints in its execution workflows.

Suggestions

Collapse 'Reference Files' and 'When to Use Each Reference' into a single section to remove the duplicated per-file guidance and tighten token usage.

Add validation/verification checkpoints to the execution workflows (e.g. verify the test was created before calling configure_load, poll execution status before read_summary) so workflow_clarity can exceed the batch-operation cap of 3.

Show at least one complete, fully-argued MCP call example (tool, action, and a filled-in args object) to move actionability from concrete-named to copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient (no concept explanations Claude already knows), but the 'Reference Files' section and the subsequent 'When to Use Each Reference' section largely duplicate each other, and 'When to Use MCP Tools' restates the tool list above it — noticeable tightening opportunity.

3 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete, named MCP invocations with actions, required args, return values, and two numbered example workflows, which is mostly executable guidance; it stops short of a complete copy-paste call with all arguments filled in.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Quick Start and example workflows provide a clear numbered sequence, but starting executions and configuring load are batch/heavy operations with no validation or verification checkpoints (e.g. confirm the test was created before configuring, check execution status before reading results), which caps this dimension at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clean overview that points to seven one-level-deep reference files via clearly signaled markdown links, each annotated with its topics and paired with a navigation guide; all referenced files exist in ./references/.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description that explicitly states both capabilities and detailed use-when triggers tied to a specific product niche. Minor room to add synonyms/file extensions for trigger richness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete capabilities across seven numbered categories (e.g. 'Configuring load settings and distribution', 'Creating and running tests (JMeter, Browser, URL/API, Multi-Test)', 'Analyzing reports and filtering data'), giving comprehensive coverage of specific actions rather than vague abstractions.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'what' ('Comprehensive guide for BlazeMeter Performance Testing, including...') and 'when' with a concrete 'Use when working with Performance tests for (1)...(7)..., or any other Performance Testing tasks' trigger clause, matching the top anchor pattern.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural terms a user would say ('Performance tests', 'load settings', 'JMeter', 'Taurus', 'reports', 'troubleshooting', 'APM Integration') with good coverage, but lacks common synonyms or file extensions (e.g. '.jmx', 'load testing') that would push it to comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'BlazeMeter Performance Testing' is a clearly named product niche with distinct triggers (JMeter, Taurus, BlazeMeter load configuration); it is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 7 missing, 7 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
Blazemeter/bzm-mcp
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.