Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with a verified reference file. Its weakest area is workflow clarity, where the heap-snapshot workflow could use explicit validation/feedback loops given the cost of these operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop to the capture/compare workflow (e.g., 'if a snapshot fails to load, re-capture and re-run compare_heapsnapshots').
Add a checkpoint after compare_heapsnapshots to confirm the diff shows meaningful growth before drilling into retainers, to avoid wasted inspection.
Trim the restated intro paragraph and the duplicated emphasis on closing snapshots to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficiently lists MCP tools and parameters without explaining basic concepts, though the opening line restates the description and a few phrasings could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names specific tools, parameters (classIndex, filterName), and named leak-category filters, giving mostly executable guidance; guidance is instruction-based rather than literal copy-paste code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (capture, compare, inspect, advanced) with implicit checkpoints like 'confirm that the files load' and 'before changing code', though it lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for these expensive batch operations. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference to the real references/common-leaks.md file, keeping detail out of SKILL.md. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |