Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with concrete commands and verification loops. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: the guide is a single inline document rather than an overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference files, and it carries minor verbosity.
Suggestions
Split the per-symptom/error reference detail (DevToolsActivePort, empty profile, missing tools, extensions) into a separate reference file (e.g., ERROR-REFERENCE.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview that links to it.
Trim softening prose such as 'This is the simplest and safest way to verify' and 'your primary goal is to guide the user' so every token earns its place.
Proofread for typos like '--autoBronnect' and 'in configured' to keep the executable guidance reliable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes competence, listing concrete errors, flags, commands, and URLs without explaining basic concepts, but a few softening sentences ('This is the simplest and safest way to verify', 'your primary goal is to guide the user') and minor typos could be tightened, placing it between the level-2 and level-3 anchors. | 2.5 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance — specific flags (--autoConnect, --browserUrl, --categoryExtensions, --slim, --logFile), an exact URL to navigate (chrome://inspect/#remote-debugging), and concrete commands (npx chrome-devtools-mcp@latest --help, DEBUG=* ... --logFile=/tmp/cdm-test.log, gh issue list ...) — matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | It presents a clear six-step sequence with explicit gating checkpoints and recovery loops ('Once the user confirms both steps, your only next action should be to call list_pages'; 'If list_pages succeeds, the problem is resolved. If it still fails ... then you can proceed'), matching the level-3 anchor for clear sequencing with feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into labeled sections (Step N, Error:/Symptom:) and so is not a monolithic wall, but at ~95 lines it exceeds the under-50-line leniency and keeps all per-symptom detail inline with only an external doc URL rather than well-signaled one-level-deep reference files, matching the level-2 anchor where content that could be separate is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10.5 / 12 Passed |