Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable with concrete executable queries and clear sequencing, but it is verbose due to repetitive code blocks and overlapping guidance sections, and lacks explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Collapse the repeated per-dimension get_cost_data blocks into one parameterized example plus a table of group_by values to remove redundancy.
Merge or trim the overlapping Best Practices, Tips for Effective Analysis, Common Analysis Patterns, and Advanced Techniques sections, which restate the same guidance.
Add an explicit validation step (e.g. reconcile per-dimension totals against the overall total, handle empty/missing dimensions) with a feedback loop before producing the output tables.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body repeats near-identical get_cost_data blocks across four primary dimensions and four multi-dimensional breakdowns (only group_by varies), and the Best Practices, Tips, Common Patterns, and Advanced Techniques sections restate overlapping guidance, so it could be materially tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Dozens of concrete, executable get_cost_data calls with real FQDIDs (CZ:Service, CZ:Account, User:Defined:Team, CZ:Tag:Environment) and specific parameters are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–7 are clearly sequenced and the "All Math In Code" rule is a useful correctness check, but there are no explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoints (e.g. empty results, missing dimensions, totals not reconciling across breakdowns). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and offloads detailed reference material to clearly signaled one-level-deep files in the See Also block (best-practices, tools reference, error-handling, dimensions, cost-types). | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |