CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

lading-optimize-hunt

Coordinates optimization attempts. Captures baselines, implements changes, invokes review, and records outcomes.

80

1.37x
Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

88%

1.37x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/lading-optimize-hunt/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable optimization workflow with strong validation gates and clean progressive disclosure through real bundle files and sibling-skill delegation. Its only weakness is a minor conciseness issue from triple-repeating the capability summary.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely lean and command-driven, but the capability summary ('captures baselines, implements changes, ... records outcomes') is restated nearly verbatim three times (frontmatter echo, the intro line, and the Role section); not 3 because that redundancy could be tightened, not 1 because there is no concept over-explanation or padding beyond the repetition.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (cargo criterion, hyperfine, ci/validate, rm -f) with defined variables ($BENCH, $PAYLOADTOOL_CONFIG) and an explicit positional hand-off format; matches the executable-and-complete anchor; not 2 because nothing is pseudocode or missing key details.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Phases 0–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit CRITICAL checkpoints (baseline before changes, all benchmarks complete) and a ci/validate feedback loop with error-recovery guidance for pre-existing bugs; matches the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor; not 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a concise overview that delegates to sibling skills via slash commands and stores records in verified one-level-deep bundle files (assets/db.yaml, assets/db/<id>.yaml, assets/index.template.yaml, all present); matches the clear-overview-with-one-level-deep-references anchor; not 2 because content is appropriately split rather than inlined.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

60%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and action-oriented but lacks any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which caps its completeness and limits trigger-term quality. It is reasonably distinct as a coordinator but risks overlap with sibling optimization skills.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when ...' trigger clause naming natural user phrasings (e.g. 'Use when running an optimization pass on lading benchmarks or when the user asks to optimize/speed up a target.').

Expand trigger-term coverage with common variations like 'optimize', 'benchmark', 'speed up', and 'perf' so the skill surfaces for natural requests.

Sharpen distinctiveness by naming the coordinator-and-recorder role explicitly and contrasting it with the find-target and review siblings to reduce overlap.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Captures baselines', 'implements changes', 'invokes review', and 'records outcomes' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor; not below 2 because four distinct actions are named rather than a vague domain reference.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does, but offers no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, so per the judging guidelines completeness is capped at 2; not 3 because 'when' is entirely absent rather than explicit.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'optimization attempts' supplies one natural keyword, but there is no trigger phrasing and no common variations (e.g. 'optimize', 'speed up', 'benchmark'); not 3 because coverage of natural user terms is thin, not 1 because 'optimization' is a term users would actually say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Coordinates ... invokes review' framing carves a coordinator niche, but 'optimization attempts' is generic and overlaps with sibling lading-optimize-* skills (find-target, review); not 3 because no distinct triggers separate it from those siblings.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
DataDog/lading
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.