Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, highly actionable coordinator skill with strong validation checkpoints and executable commands throughout. Its main weakness is the description-level trigger guidance (separate rubric) rather than the body itself, which is concise, clear, and well-structured.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes competence — phases are short, commands are direct, and it does not explain what cargo/hyperfine are — with only minor repetition (the coordinator role and 'Print it out' lines restated a few times) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash commands are given for baseline capture, macro/micro benchmarks, validation, and recording, with concrete file paths and argument templates that cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six phases (0–5) are clearly sequenced with explicit CRITICAL validation checkpoints ('All benchmarks must complete before continuing', 'ci/validate', 'If ci/validate repeatedly fails... document it and stop'), an error-recovery loop, and a clear handoff contract with find-target and review. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well-organized with one-level-deep references to real bundle files (assets/db.yaml, index.template.yaml, db/<id>.yaml), all of which exist; it stops short of 5 because the body inlines the full baseline/recording detail rather than presenting itself as a pure overview with signaled links to detail files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |