Build in public with vibe raising. Launch your builder coin and ship products under it — every launch compounds funding and traction back to your builder. Claim vesting rewards and trading fees. Gas-free on Frame (Base).
30
26%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./public/skills/0xnb-dev/openclaw-frame-builder-skills/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
17%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description reads like marketing copy for a Web3 product rather than a functional skill description. It lacks concrete technical actions Claude would perform, uses niche jargon without natural trigger terms, and completely omits any 'Use when...' guidance for skill selection. The description would be nearly unusable for Claude to correctly identify when to apply this skill among alternatives.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to launch a token on Base, create a builder coin, claim vesting rewards, or interact with the Frame platform.'
Replace marketing language ('vibe raising', 'compounds funding and traction') with concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Deploys ERC-20 builder tokens on Base, registers product launches under a builder profile, claims vesting rewards and trading fees via Frame.'
Include file types, platform names, or command patterns users might reference, e.g., 'builder.fun', 'Base chain', 'token launch', 'crypto crowdfunding'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description names some actions ('Launch your builder coin', 'ship products', 'Claim vesting rewards and trading fees') but uses marketing-heavy language ('vibe raising', 'build in public', 'compounds funding and traction') that obscures concrete technical capabilities. It's unclear what specific operations the skill performs. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | There is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance. The description reads like a product pitch rather than a skill description — it vaguely describes what the platform does but never tells Claude when to select this skill. The absence of a 'when' clause caps this at 2, and the weak 'what' brings it to 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The keywords are highly domain-specific jargon ('builder coin', 'vibe raising', 'Frame', 'Base', 'vesting rewards') that most users would not naturally say when seeking this functionality. Terms like 'gas-free' and 'compounds funding' read as marketing copy rather than natural trigger terms. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description is niche enough (crypto/Web3 builder coins on Base) that it wouldn't conflict with most other skills, but the vague marketing language ('build in public', 'ship products') could overlap with general product launch or project management skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a comprehensive but overly verbose guide to Frame builder coin operations. While it has concrete commands and good reference file structure, the main SKILL.md includes far too much inline content that should be delegated to reference files (heartbeat integration, memory templates, auto-update instructions, configuration details). The core launch workflow is ironically incomplete in the main file while peripheral concerns are over-documented.
Suggestions
Move the OpenClaw Heartbeat Integration, Memory Integration, Auto-Update, and OpenClaw Configuration sections to their respective reference files, keeping only 1-2 line summaries with links in SKILL.md
Include the actual launch command inline in Quick Start step 2 instead of deferring entirely to references/launch.md — the most critical action shouldn't require a file lookup
Add validation checkpoints to the Quick Start workflow: verify wallet was created after setup, confirm token address after launch, verify claim transaction succeeded
Remove the Features bullet list and Chain Info table — these are either obvious from the commands or could be a single line ('Deploys gas-free on Base Mainnet via Frame')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is extremely verbose at ~200+ lines. It includes extensive sections on memory integration, auto-update instructions, OpenClaw heartbeat integration, configuration priority explanations, and template markdown that Claude doesn't need spelled out. The features bullet list, chain info table, and license section add little actionable value. Much of this could be condensed or moved to reference files. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready (e.g., `node {baseDir}/src/setup.js`), but the actual launch workflow is incomplete — step 2 says 'See references/launch.md for full launch script' without showing the critical launch command inline. The heartbeat HEARTBEAT.md examples are templates rather than executable instructions. Claims commands are clear and specific. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Quick Start provides a reasonable 4-step sequence, but lacks validation checkpoints — there's no verification after wallet setup, no confirmation after launch, and no error recovery steps in the main workflow. The heartbeat integration describes a flow but doesn't include validation. For operations involving real tokens and funds on Base mainnet, missing verification steps are a significant gap. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Detailed Guides table at the bottom provides well-organized one-level-deep references to 9 separate files, which is good structure. However, the SKILL.md itself is bloated with content that should live in those reference files — the entire OpenClaw Heartbeat Integration section, Memory Integration section, Auto-Update section, and OpenClaw Configuration section could each be their own reference docs. The main file tries to be both overview and detailed guide. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
72%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 8 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 8 / 11 Passed | |
f45fcb5
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.