angular-migration

Migrate from AngularJS to Angular using hybrid mode, incremental component rewriting, and dependency injection updates. Use when upgrading AngularJS applications, planning framework migrations, or modernizing legacy Angular code.

1.06x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

100%

1.06x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with complete before/after code, but it is verbose for an overview, lacks validation/feedback checkpoints in its migration workflow, and its progressive-disclosure references all point to missing bundle files. These keep conciseness, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure at the mid level while actionability is strong.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to the Migration Timeline (e.g., after each phase: run the hybrid app, confirm no regressions, only proceed when tests pass) to introduce feedback loops for the risky migration workflow.

Create the referenced bundle files (references/*.md, assets/hybrid-bootstrap.ts, assets/migration-timeline.md, scripts/analyze-angular-app.sh) or remove the broken references, and move the larger before/after code blocks into those references so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.

Tighten the body by trimming or offloading the most extensive inlined sections (e.g., the two-approach Forms Migration and full DI upgrade/downgrade blocks) to reduce token cost while keeping the canonical example inline.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it is long — many full before/after code blocks (forms with two approaches, full DI upgrade/downgrade) are inlined when an overview could be leaner. It sits between 'mostly efficient' and 'lean', so 2 rather than 3, and above the verbose/fluff anchor at 1.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, executable TypeScript/JavaScript before-and-after examples for components, directives, services, DI, routing, and forms that are copy-paste ready, matching the fully-executable top anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The Migration Timeline sequences phases 1-4 and 'Start with Services' gives ordering, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or validate-fix-retry feedback loops for a risky batch migration, which caps the score at 2 per the rubric's destructive/batch guideline.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	A Resources section signals references with one-line descriptions, but every referenced file (references/.md, assets/, scripts/*) is missing from the bundle, and large detailed code that could live in those references is inlined instead — the structure is present but undermined by broken links and inline-heavy content.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, trigger-rich, complete, and clearly bounded to a distinct niche, with both a concrete capability statement and an explicit 'Use when' clause. Voice is correctly third person with no over-claims.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'hybrid mode, incremental component rewriting, and dependency injection updates' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor rather than the single-domain anchor at 2.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly states what it does and includes an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, satisfying both halves of the top anchor; not capped at 2 since the trigger guidance is present.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Covers natural terms a user would say — 'upgrading AngularJS applications, planning framework migrations, or modernizing legacy Angular code' — with good breadth; not merely technical jargon.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The AngularJS-to-Angular migration niche is clearly bounded with distinct triggers, making conflict with unrelated skills unlikely; third-person voice is maintained throughout.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 7 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust
Commit: e9f9b67

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.