Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured single-task skill: executable commands, a sensible iteration workflow, preflight checks, and a real referenced script. It is held back only slightly by minor verbosity and an implicit quality gate in the iterate loop.
Suggestions
Make the iterate→final gate explicit, e.g. 'Show the user the 1K draft; only switch to 4K once they confirm the prompt is correct.'
Trim soft filler such as 'Preserve user's creative intent in both cases.' since it restates the preceding guidance.
Consider moving the resolution-keyword mapping or prompt templates into a short reference section so the core workflow reads even faster.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with executable commands and tight sections, but a few soft phrases ('Preserve user's creative intent in both cases.') and mild restatement keep it just shy of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for both generate and edit, plus concrete filename patterns, resolution mapping, and worked examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear draft→iterate→final sequence plus a preflight checklist and common-failure recovery table provide most checkpoints, though the iterate loop's 'is the draft good enough?' gate is implied rather than an explicit validation step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with the implementation correctly pushed into one real referenced bundle file (scripts/generate_image.py); guidance content is appropriately inline, with only minor organization room. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |