Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable orchestrator document with explicit sequencing, a checkpoint, routing table, and validation checklist. Its main costs are token duplication — the output file manifest appears twice and stage routing three times — and the absence of an error-recovery loop or a concrete mechanism for the human-in-the-loop checkpoint. The Related section provides clean one-level-deep navigation to the stage skills.
Suggestions
Eliminate the duplicated file manifest: state the naming convention once and have the 'Final summary format' reference it (or link a reference file) instead of repeating all 14 filenames verbatim.
Add an error-recovery step after the Validation checklist, e.g. 'If a check fails: fix or re-run the failed stage via --stage=X before proceeding downstream', to close the feedback loop for this batch pipeline.
Specify the Stage 4 checkpoint mechanism — what question to ask via AskUserQuestion and what the angle/title options look like — so the human-in-the-loop step is executable rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational with no concept explanations, but the 14-file output listing is duplicated verbatim in both 'Output naming convention' and 'Final summary format', and stage routing appears three times (Workflow, dependency graph, Stage Routing table). Mostly efficient but noticeably could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: copy-paste invocation examples, exact context fields with formats (YYYY-MM-DD, kebab-case slug), an exact stage-to-skill routing table, and a verbatim final-summary template. The one gap is the Stage 4 checkpoint — 'wait for angle + title choice' does not specify how to ask or what options to present, so guidance is mostly but not fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 8-step sequence with an explicit CHECKPOINT, an anti-patterns section ('Do not proceed to the next stage if an upstream stage failed'), and a validation checklist covering upstream files, checkpoint respect, and naming. Missing a fix-and-retry feedback loop for failed stages — the guidance stops at 'do not proceed' rather than what to do next, a minor validation gap for a batch pipeline. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is well-sectioned with clearly labeled one-level-deep links to the six sibling stage skills and a workflow guide. The duplicated file listings and the boilerplate final-summary template are arguably reference material that could be consolidated or split out, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |