Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, fully executable workflow: concrete git/gh commands, precise per-section template rules with conditional logic, and explicit user-confirmation checkpoints before the irreversible create step. It avoids explaining anything Claude already knows and needs no external reference files, matching the rubric's good-overall examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what git, gh, or PRs are; every sentence is either a directive, a project-specific constraint ("This is a public repo: don't name real users, user IDs, or production infrastructure resources"), or decision guidance ("an empty or padded section is worse than none"). Nothing reads as trimmable over-explanation, so it fits the 'every token earns its place' anchor rather than the 'minor instances that could be trimmed' level. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is copy-paste executable: a complete context-gathering block (git log/diff against "$BASE", gh pr list --json), concrete per-section rules (e.g., "- [x] No accessibility-impacting changes in this PR"), and a full `gh pr create` HEREDOC template with exact section ordering. This matches the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit (gather context → fill template sections → create PR) with real validation checkpoints: check the branch is pushed ("push it with git push -u origin HEAD"), confirm with the user before the outward-facing action ("Ask 'Ready to create?' before running gh pr create"), and ask the user when the ticket number is missing from the branch name. Not score 4 — checkpoints and fallback paths are explicit, not implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no external references needed; the body is well-organized into clearly headed phases ("## Gathering Context", "## Filling In the Template" with one subsection per template field, "## Creating the PR") and all content is appropriately placed inline. There are no buried or nested references and no content that clearly belongs in a separate file, so the well-organized single-file structure earns the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |