Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-organized rulebook for Angular DI with concrete API patterns and a valid one-level reference. Its weaknesses are the redundant "Canonical response anchors" section and the lack of a complete executable code example or annotated reference link.
Suggestions
Remove or fold the "Canonical response anchors" section into the Guidelines bullets — it repeats terminology already stated above and adds token cost without new guidance.
Annotate the reference link, e.g. "[DI Patterns](references/di-patterns.md) — full code examples for inject(), tokens, and interface abstraction", so it is clear when to consult it.
Include one short complete code block (e.g., a service using inject() plus an app.config.ts providers array) in the body so the most common case is copy-paste ready without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The bullet guidance itself is lean and assumes Angular knowledge, but the "Canonical response anchors" section (7 anchor phrases plus "Additional task-grounded exact anchors") largely restates terminology already present in the bullets, which is padding that could be trimmed — matching the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-adaptable patterns appear throughout ("inject(MyService)", "@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })", "{ provide: API_URL, useValue: 'https://api.example.com' }", "provideAppInitializer(() => inject(ConfigService).load())") with file locations like app.config.ts, matching the mostly-executable anchor; it misses 5 because the body contains no complete executable code example (full examples live only in the reference file). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a guidance skill, not a multi-step workflow, and the Principles → Guidelines → Anti-Patterns structure makes each decision rule unambiguous with no destructive or batch operations that would demand validation checkpoints; it stays at 4 rather than 5 because the rules are presented as a scattered set (e.g., Route Providers, Multi Providers) rather than one clearly prioritized decision flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short (~35 lines), well-sectioned, and points to a real one-level-deep reference (references/di-patterns.md, verified to exist) under a dedicated References section; it misses 5 because the reference is a bare unannotated link with no indication of what it contains or when to consult it, and its content partially duplicates the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |