Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, actionable rulebook: lean bullets, concrete formats, commands, and real one-level reference files. The one real gap is workflow validation — rules are stated as flat imperatives with implicit checkpoints, and the destructive history-rewrite and force-push guidance lacks explicit verify/recover steps.
Suggestions
Sequence the destructive operations as explicit steps with checkpoints — e.g. for secret purging: run `git filter-repo`, then `git log --all -p | grep <pattern>` to verify removal, then rotate the secret; and for rebase: `git push --force-with-lease` only after re-running tests on the rebased branch.
Make the pre-merge checkpoints an ordered list (self-review → CI green → rebase onto target → squash) so the review/merge workflow is an explicit sequence rather than scattered rules.
Include one complete example PR body (what/why/how-to-test, 'Closes #123') in the body or implementation.md so the PR guidance is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean bullet-list of rules with zero padding — no explanation of what git is, why version control matters, or any filler. Every line is directive, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable specifics throughout: the commit format template with a worked example ('feat(auth): add login validation'), enumerated types and branch prefixes, named commands ('git rebase -i', 'git filter-repo'), named tools (husky, lefthook), and a hard numeric limit ('< 300 lines of code'). Minor gaps keep it below fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5 — e.g. no complete example PR body or husky hook config. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is organized by topic rather than as a sequenced workflow, and validation checkpoints are implicit at best ('Pull before you push', 'PRs must pass all CI checks before merging', 'Self-review... before requesting peers'). There are no explicit validate→fix→retry loops — notably the destructive 'git filter-repo' purge instruction and 'git push --force-with-lease' reference carry no verification steps, which caps this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a short, well-sectioned overview with two clearly signaled, one-level-deep references ('[implementation examples](references/implementation.md)' and the References section link to CLEAN_HISTORY.md); both files exist and contain no further nesting. This matches the clean-split anchor exactly, including the under-50-lines simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |