CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

paper-2-web

This skill should be used when converting academic papers into promotional and presentation formats including interactive websites (Paper2Web), presentation videos (Paper2Video), and conference posters (Paper2Poster). Use this skill for tasks involving paper dissemination, conference preparation, creating explorable academic homepages, generating video abstracts, or producing print-ready posters from LaTeX or PDF sources.

77

2.63x
Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

2.63x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./scientific-skills/paper-2-web/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly defines a specific niche (academic paper conversion to promotional formats), lists concrete actions and output types, and provides explicit trigger guidance with natural keywords. It uses proper third-person voice and covers both the 'what' and 'when' comprehensively. The branded terms (Paper2Web, Paper2Video, Paper2Poster) further enhance distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: converting academic papers into interactive websites (Paper2Web), presentation videos (Paper2Video), and conference posters (Paper2Poster). Also mentions specific source formats (LaTeX, PDF).

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (converting academic papers into websites, videos, posters) and 'when' with explicit triggers ('Use this skill for tasks involving paper dissemination, conference preparation, creating explorable academic homepages, generating video abstracts, or producing print-ready posters').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'academic papers', 'conference posters', 'presentation videos', 'video abstracts', 'paper dissemination', 'conference preparation', 'academic homepages', 'LaTeX', 'PDF', plus branded terms like Paper2Web, Paper2Video, Paper2Poster.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive niche focused on academic paper conversion to promotional formats. The specific domain (academic papers) combined with specific output formats (Paper2Web, Paper2Video, Paper2Poster) makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

35%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is comprehensive in coverage but severely bloated, containing extensive content Claude doesn't need (deployment platform lists, printing service names, social media distribution advice, quality metric taxonomies). The core actionable content—CLI commands and input/output structure—is buried in verbose surrounding material. The skill would benefit enormously from aggressive trimming and moving most content into reference files.

Suggestions

Cut the content by at least 60%: remove 'When to Use This Skill' trigger phrases, 'Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics', 'Integration and Deployment', 'Evaluation and Quality Metrics', and 'Platform-Specific Features' sections entirely—these are either obvious to Claude or belong in reference files.

Move Troubleshooting, Resource Requirements, Advanced Usage, and Best Practices into reference files, keeping only the Quick Start, Basic Usage commands, Input Requirements, and Output Structure in the main SKILL.md.

Add explicit validation steps into the main workflow: e.g., 'After generation completes, verify output exists and check logs for errors before delivering to user'.

Consolidate the decision tree and basic usage into a single concise workflow section with numbered steps and inline validation checkpoints.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Extremely verbose at ~400+ lines. Contains extensive sections Claude already knows (what GitHub Pages is, what YouTube is, what poster printing services exist, basic deployment concepts). The 'When to Use This Skill' section with trigger phrases, the 'Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics' section, platform-specific features, integration/deployment advice, and evaluation metrics are all padding that doesn't help Claude execute the task.

1 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete CLI commands for the pipeline which are copy-paste ready, but much of the content is descriptive rather than instructive. The batch processing example, basic usage commands, and input structure are actionable, but sections like 'Evaluation and Quality Metrics', 'Integration and Deployment', and 'Best Practices' are vague guidance rather than executable steps.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The decision tree and basic usage commands provide a reasonable workflow sequence, and the Quality Assurance section lists verification steps. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints integrated into the generation workflow itself—no 'verify output before proceeding' steps, no error recovery loops in the main pipeline, and the troubleshooting section is separate from the workflow rather than integrated as feedback loops.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References to detailed documentation files (paper2web.md, paper2video.md, etc.) are well-signaled with arrow markers, which is good. However, the main SKILL.md itself is a monolithic wall of text with far too much inline content that should be in reference files (troubleshooting, platform-specific features, integration/deployment, evaluation metrics, resource requirements). The overview doesn't stay concise enough to serve as a true entry point.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.