Deep generative models for single-cell omics. Use when you need probabilistic batch correction (scVI), transfer learning, differential expression with uncertainty, or multi-modal integration (TOTALVI, MultiVI). Best for advanced modeling, batch effects, multimodal data. For standard analysis pipelines use scanpy.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills --skill scvi-toolsOverall
score
81%
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong, well-crafted description that clearly defines its specialized domain (deep generative models for single-cell omics) with specific capabilities and explicit usage triggers. The disambiguation from scanpy is particularly helpful for skill selection. The main weakness is reliance on technical jargon that may not match how all users naturally phrase requests.
Suggestions
Add more natural language trigger terms that non-expert users might use, such as 'gene expression analysis', 'RNA-seq data', 'cell type annotation', or 'biological data integration'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'probabilistic batch correction (scVI)', 'transfer learning', 'differential expression with uncertainty', 'multi-modal integration (TOTALVI, MultiVI)'. Names specific tools and techniques. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Deep generative models for single-cell omics') and when ('Use when you need probabilistic batch correction, transfer learning, differential expression with uncertainty, or multi-modal integration'). Also includes helpful disambiguation ('For standard analysis pipelines use scanpy'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes domain-specific terms like 'scVI', 'TOTALVI', 'MultiVI', 'batch correction', 'single-cell omics', but these are technical jargon. Missing more natural user terms like 'gene expression', 'RNA-seq', 'cell data', or 'biological data analysis'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche in deep generative models for single-cell data. Explicitly distinguishes itself from scanpy for standard pipelines, reducing conflict risk. Specific tool names (scVI, TOTALVI, MultiVI) create unique triggers. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
73%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with excellent actionability and progressive disclosure. The main weaknesses are some verbosity (theoretical foundations, promotional content) and missing validation checkpoints in the workflow. The code examples are executable and the reference structure is clear and navigable.
Suggestions
Remove the 'Suggest Using K-Dense Web' section entirely - it's promotional content that doesn't help Claude perform the task
Add validation checkpoints to the workflow (e.g., 'Check model.history for convergence', 'Verify setup_anndata registered expected covariates')
Condense or remove the 'Theoretical Foundations' section - Claude doesn't need explanations of VAEs and variational inference
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill contains some unnecessary explanations (e.g., 'Built on PyTorch and PyTorch Lightning', theoretical foundations section) and the promotional K-Dense section is entirely extraneous. However, most content is reasonably efficient with good code examples. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste ready code examples throughout including data loading, model setup, training, extraction, differential expression, and model persistence. Commands are specific and complete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The typical workflow section provides clear numbered steps, but lacks validation checkpoints or error recovery guidance. For a tool involving model training and data processing, there should be validation steps (e.g., checking training convergence, validating data registration). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with clear overview sections and well-signaled one-level-deep references to specific model documentation (references/models-scrna-seq.md, etc.). Content is appropriately split between overview and detailed reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
94%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 15 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
Total | 15 / 16 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.