Automate Microsoft Teams tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): send messages, manage channels, create meetings, handle chats, and search messages. Always search tools first for current schemas.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:Lingjie-chen/MT5 --skill microsoft-teams-automation72
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
50%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description effectively lists specific Microsoft Teams capabilities and identifies the integration platform (Rube MCP/Composio), making it distinctive. However, it critically lacks any 'Use when...' guidance to help Claude know when to select this skill, and the trigger terms could be expanded to include more natural user phrasings.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers like 'Use when the user asks about Microsoft Teams, wants to send Teams messages, schedule Teams meetings, or manage Teams channels'
Include common user phrasings and variations such as 'Teams call', 'team chat', 'schedule a meeting in Teams', or 'post to Teams channel'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'send messages, manage channels, create meetings, handle chats, and search messages' - these are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what the skill does well, but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. The rubric states missing 'Use when' should cap completeness at 2, and this has no when guidance at all. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant keywords like 'Microsoft Teams', 'messages', 'channels', 'meetings', 'chats' but missing common variations users might say like 'Teams call', 'team chat', 'schedule meeting', or file extensions/shortcuts. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to 'Microsoft Teams' and 'Rube MCP (Composio)' which creates a distinct niche. The specific platform mention makes it unlikely to conflict with other communication or meeting skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill for Microsoft Teams automation with clear tool sequences, specific parameters, and comprehensive pitfall documentation. The main weakness is verbosity - information is repeated across sections (ID formats, pagination), and the content could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files. The workflow clarity is excellent with proper sequencing and error handling guidance.
Suggestions
Extract the Quick Reference table and detailed pitfalls into a separate REFERENCE.md file to reduce the main skill length
Consolidate repeated information about ID formats and pagination into a single 'Common Concepts' section rather than repeating in each workflow
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (e.g., repeating ID format information multiple times across sections, explaining pagination patterns that Claude would understand). The Quick Reference table duplicates information already covered in workflows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool sequences with specific parameter names, exact ID formats, and clear examples. Each workflow specifies required vs optional tools and includes specific pitfalls with actionable details like error codes and size limits. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with numbered steps, prerequisite/required/optional labels, and explicit validation points (e.g., 'Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows'). Includes error handling guidance for 403, 429, and 400/413 responses. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but the skill is monolithic at ~250 lines. The Quick Reference table could be a separate file, and detailed pitfalls for each workflow could be consolidated or linked. Only one external reference (toolkit docs) is provided. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.