CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

outlook-automation

Automate Outlook tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): emails, calendar, contacts, folders, attachments. Always search tools first for current schemas.

69

1.53x
Quality

53%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

97%

1.53x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.trae/skills/outlook-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear niche (Outlook automation via Rube MCP/Composio) and lists the major domain areas it covers, making it reasonably distinctive. However, it lacks specific concrete actions within each domain area and is missing an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which limits its effectiveness for skill selection. The instruction about searching tools first is an implementation detail that doesn't help with skill matching.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to send emails, schedule meetings, manage contacts, or perform any Outlook-related task.'

Replace the category list with specific actions: 'Send/read/search emails, schedule/update calendar events, manage contacts and folders, handle attachments' instead of just listing 'emails, calendar, contacts, folders, attachments'.

Move the implementation detail 'Always search tools first for current schemas' to the skill body rather than the description, as it doesn't help Claude decide when to select this skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists the domain areas (emails, calendar, contacts, folders, attachments) but doesn't describe specific concrete actions like 'send emails, schedule meetings, create contacts'. The mention of 'Automate Outlook tasks' is somewhat vague, and 'Always search tools first for current schemas' is an implementation detail rather than a capability.

2 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is partially addressed (automate Outlook tasks across several categories), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance. The description lacks explicit guidance on when Claude should select this skill.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like 'Outlook', 'emails', 'calendar', 'contacts', 'folders', 'attachments', and 'Composio' which are natural terms. However, it's missing common variations users might say like 'send email', 'schedule meeting', 'read inbox', 'appointment', or 'Microsoft Outlook'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'Outlook', 'Rube MCP', and 'Composio' creates a very distinct niche. It's unlikely to conflict with other skills since it specifically targets Outlook automation via a particular MCP integration.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Implementation

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid reference skill that covers Outlook automation comprehensively with clear tool sequences, parameter documentation, and pitfall warnings. Its main weaknesses are the lack of executable call examples (showing actual MCP invocations with sample data), missing validation/error-recovery steps in workflows, and some redundancy across sections that inflates token usage. The content would benefit from being more concise and including concrete invocation examples.

Suggestions

Add at least one fully executable MCP call example per core workflow showing exact parameter values (e.g., a complete RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call followed by OUTLOOK_SEARCH_MESSAGES with sample query)

Add validation checkpoints and error recovery guidance to core workflows (e.g., 'If search returns empty results, verify account type is Microsoft 365' or 'If message_id lookup fails, confirm you're using hitId not resource.id')

Consolidate the Known Pitfalls section with per-workflow pitfalls to eliminate redundancy—either keep pitfalls only in workflows or only in the dedicated section

Consider splitting KQL/OData syntax references and the quick reference table into a separate REFERENCE.md file to reduce the main skill's token footprint

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is fairly well-organized but includes some redundancy—pitfalls are repeated across sections (e.g., account type limitations mentioned in both workflow 1 and Known Pitfalls), and the quick reference table partially duplicates information already covered in each workflow section. Some trimming would improve token efficiency.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides specific tool names, parameter names, and query syntax examples, which is good. However, there are no executable code snippets or copy-paste-ready MCP call examples showing exact invocation patterns with sample parameters. The guidance is concrete but stops short of fully executable examples.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with numbered steps and labeled as Required/Optional/Prerequisite. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery loops—e.g., no guidance on what to do if a search returns no results, if pagination fails, or if connection drops mid-workflow. The setup section has a basic validation flow but core workflows lack feedback loops.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-structured with clear sections and a quick reference table, but it's a long monolithic file (~180 lines of dense content) that could benefit from splitting detailed workflow sections or the KQL/OData syntax references into separate files. The external link to Composio docs is good but there's no internal file decomposition.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
Lingjie-chen/MT5
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.