Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-organized, providing copy-paste-ready commands across the per-package and monorepo cases. Its main weakness is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints and a fix-and-retry feedback loop for the batch/destructive lint:fix step.
Suggestions
Insert an explicit validation/gating checkpoint after `yarn lint:fix` (e.g. re-run lint without --fix or check the exit status) before proceeding to build, so failures halt the workflow.
Add a fix-and-retry feedback loop ("If lint reports remaining errors, review them, fix manually, and re-run until clean") to support the destructive auto-fix step.
Make the terminal step a concrete verification (e.g. confirm test exit code is 0 and report pass/fail counts) rather than a generic "Report any errors encountered".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (file categorization, decision rules, commands) earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for both the per-package and whole-monorepo cases, covering the common scenarios concretely, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The steps are clearly sequenced, but `yarn lint:fix` auto-modifies files and the workflow runs lint:fix, build, and test with only a trailing "Report any errors" and no validate-then-proceed checkpoint or fix-and-retry feedback loop, so the destructive/batch-operation cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short (~40 line), single-purpose skill with no need for external bundle files; the body is organized into clearly numbered, well-signaled sections, qualifying for the simple-skill top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |