CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

memorize

Curates insights from reflections and critiques into CLAUDE.md using Agentic Context Engineering

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/reflexion/skills/memorize/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable with a clear four-phase workflow and concrete templates, but it is notably verbose and monolithic, inlining material that would benefit from separate reference files.

Suggestions

Trim or remove meta-commentary sections ('Expected Outcomes', 'Memory Quality Indicators', 'Implementation Notes') that restate knowledge Claude already has, to improve conciseness.

Move the full CLAUDE.md section catalog and the Memory Update Template into a reference file (e.g. references/sections.md) referenced one level deep from SKILL.md.

Convert abstract Phase 4 quality gates into concrete runnable checks (e.g. a grep/diff command to detect duplicate bullets) to push workflow clarity toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~300-line body is noticeably verbose, with padded meta-sections ('Expected Outcomes', 'Memory Quality Indicators', extensive impact categorization) that restate curation concepts Claude already knows; it is not severe enough for a 1 but well below a lean 3.

2 / 5

Actionability

Provides a concrete copy-paste Memory Update Template (with yaml block), a worked example transformation, a fixed CLAUDE.md section catalog, and flag-based usage examples; only minor gaps in executable detail keep it from a 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Four phases are clearly sequenced (Harvesting -> Curation -> Updates -> Validation) with an explicit Phase 4 quality-gate validation block, but some checkpoints are stated abstractly rather than as runnable checks, so it sits just below a 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all content (full template, section catalog, indicators) is inlined in one ~300-line file with good headings but no one-level-deep external references; the under-50-line exception does not apply, so it lands at the 'some structure, content that should be separate is inline' anchor.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and names a distinct niche, but omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and relies on somewhat technical terms over natural user phrasing.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when consolidating lessons from a reflection or critique session into CLAUDE.md.'

Include natural user phrasing such as 'memorize', 'remember lessons', or 'update CLAUDE.md' alongside the technical ACE terminology.

List 1-2 more concrete actions (e.g. 'deduplicates and refines existing bullets') to lift specificity beyond a single action.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('insights from reflections and critiques') and one concrete action ('Curates ... into CLAUDE.md'), matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' (curate insights into CLAUDE.md) but no 'when'/'Use when...' trigger clause; per the judging guidelines a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like 'reflections', 'critiques', and 'CLAUDE.md' are relevant but lean technical; common natural variations users would actually say (e.g. 'memorize', 'remember', 'save lessons') are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tied to a specific reflexion/ACE curation niche with minimal overlap risk; only minor overlap with general memory skills keeps it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Path

plugins/reflexion/skills/memorize/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.