Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally actionable and the multi-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with validation and feedback loops, but it is a monolithic 943-line document that inlines content which should live in separate reference files.
Suggestions
Extract the per-phase prompt templates into reference files (e.g., references/prompts/exploration.md) and signal them one level deep from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Move the full worked API example to a separate examples file, keeping only a brief pointer inline.
De-duplicate the repeated 'CRITICAL' guardrails and boilerplate 'Let's approach this systematically' intros across templates to reduce token load.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~943-line body is mostly actionable templates rather than concept explanation, but it includes redundant CRITICAL notes, boilerplate intros repeated per template, and a long worked example that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every phase ships copy-paste-ready prompt templates with {placeholders}, concrete Task-tool dispatch blocks (model, subagent_type), exact file-naming conventions, and a fully worked API example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight phases are explicitly sequenced with hard wait-checkpoints ('Wait for BOTH Phase 1 AND Phase 1.5'), judge-based validation, and a REDESIGN feedback loop with escalation after two failures. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are clear, but no bundle files exist and all long prompt templates plus the worked example are inlined in one 943-line file rather than split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |