container-orchestration
Docker and Kubernetes patterns. Triggers on: Dockerfile, docker-compose, kubernetes, k8s, helm, pod, deployment, service, ingress, container, image.
76
63%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.25xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./data/skills-md/0xdarkmatter/claude-mods/container-orchestration/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
54%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has strong trigger term coverage with a comprehensive list of Docker/Kubernetes-related keywords, but critically lacks any concrete description of what the skill actually does. 'Docker and Kubernetes patterns' is too vague to help Claude understand the skill's capabilities. Adding specific actions (e.g., 'write Dockerfiles, configure docker-compose services, create Kubernetes manifests, debug pod issues') would significantly improve it.
Suggestions
Replace 'Docker and Kubernetes patterns' with specific concrete actions like 'Write Dockerfiles, configure docker-compose services, create Kubernetes manifests, set up Helm charts, debug container and pod issues'.
Add a 'Use when...' clause that describes scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user needs to containerize applications, configure orchestration, or troubleshoot container deployments'.
Disambiguate generic trigger terms like 'service', 'deployment', and 'image' by scoping them (e.g., 'Kubernetes service', 'container image') to reduce conflict risk with non-container skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description says 'Docker and Kubernetes patterns' which is extremely vague. It names the domain but lists zero concrete actions — no verbs like 'create', 'debug', 'configure', 'deploy', or 'optimize' are present. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'when' is addressed via the 'Triggers on:' clause with explicit keywords, but the 'what' is extremely weak — 'Docker and Kubernetes patterns' doesn't explain what the skill actually does. The trigger list partially compensates but the what-component is nearly absent. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'Dockerfile', 'docker-compose', 'kubernetes', 'k8s', 'helm', 'pod', 'deployment', 'service', 'ingress', 'container', 'image'. These are terms users naturally use when working in this domain. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The trigger terms are fairly specific to the container/orchestration domain, but terms like 'service', 'deployment', 'container', and 'image' are generic enough to potentially conflict with other skills (e.g., cloud deployment skills, general service architecture skills). The lack of specific actions makes it harder to distinguish from overlapping skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid reference skill with excellent actionability—all code examples are complete and production-ready. The progressive disclosure is well-structured with clear references to additional resources. The main weaknesses are some verbosity in inline comments and the lack of explicit multi-step workflows with validation checkpoints for common operations like build-deploy-verify cycles.
Suggestions
Add a workflow section showing the build-deploy-verify sequence with explicit validation steps (e.g., 'docker build → docker run locally → verify health endpoint → push → kubectl apply → kubectl rollout status → verify').
Trim inline comments that state the obvious (e.g., '# Set working directory', '# Copy application code') and consider removing the DO/DON'T list since the Dockerfile example already demonstrates these practices.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with good examples, but includes some unnecessary comments (e.g., '# Set working directory', '# Copy application code') and explanatory labels that Claude already understands. The Dockerfile rules DO/DON'T list is somewhat redundant given the well-commented example above it. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | All examples are fully executable and copy-paste ready: complete Dockerfile with multi-stage build, working docker-compose.yml, full Kubernetes manifests (Deployment, Service, Ingress), and a practical kubectl command reference table. These are concrete, real-world configurations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill presents individual resource definitions clearly but lacks an explicit workflow sequence for common multi-step operations like building, deploying, and validating. There are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for operations like applying K8s manifests or building Docker images (e.g., verify image builds, check rollout status after apply). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill provides a clear overview with well-organized sections and appropriately references deeper content via one-level-deep links to references (dockerfile-patterns.md, k8s-manifests.md, helm-patterns.md), scripts, and asset templates. Navigation is straightforward. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- NeverSight/skills_feed
- Commit
f772de4
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.