Lean and command-driven; assumes Claude's git competence and avoids explaining what rebase or conflicts are, so every line earns its place rather than padding as in the 2-anchor example.

Provides fully executable commands throughout (e.g. `git tag -a {branch_name}-rebase-backup-...`, `git rebase --rebase-merges origin/{base_branch}`, `git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:{branch_name}`), copy-paste ready with explicit placeholders.

An 8-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (preflight `git status` clean check, confirmation gates before rebase and push, post-rebase `git log` verification) and a conflict-handling feedback loop, matching the validate/fix/retry anchor for destructive operations.

Well-organized into Goals, Hard Rules, numbered Workflow, and Recovery sections; it is a self-contained single procedure with no content that needs splitting, so the well-organized-sections carve-out applies despite the absence of external references.

Names multiple concrete actions — 'sync a feature branch', 'git rebase', 'deliberate conflict resolution', 'safe force-with-lease pushing' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the partial-domain anchor at 2.

Clearly states what the skill does, but lacks any 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 2.

Covers natural terms a developer would say — 'git rebase', 'feature branch', 'conflict resolution', 'force-with-lease' — giving good coverage; not the thin 'Works with PDF files' style of a 2.

Occupies a clear niche (rebase-based branch sync with safety rails) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche' anchor rather than the overlapping 'Works with document files' style of a 2.