git-workflow
Enhanced git operations using lazygit, gh (GitHub CLI), and delta. Triggers on: stage changes, create PR, review PR, check issues, git diff, commit interactively, GitHub operations, rebase, stash, bisect.
90
Quality
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
93%
1.32xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description with excellent trigger term coverage and clear completeness. The main weakness is that it lists trigger terms rather than describing concrete capabilities - it tells you when to use it but relies on the trigger terms to imply what it does rather than explicitly stating actions like 'create and review pull requests, manage stashes, perform interactive rebases'.
Suggestions
Expand the capability description to include concrete actions: 'Creates and reviews pull requests, manages stashes, performs interactive rebases, visualizes diffs with syntax highlighting' rather than relying on trigger terms to imply capabilities.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (git operations) and lists tools (lazygit, gh, delta), but the actions are mostly listed as trigger terms rather than described as concrete capabilities. Missing explicit descriptions of what the skill actually does with these tools. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Enhanced git operations using lazygit, gh, and delta') and when ('Triggers on:' followed by explicit trigger terms). The 'Triggers on:' clause serves as an explicit equivalent to 'Use when...'. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'stage changes', 'create PR', 'review PR', 'check issues', 'git diff', 'commit interactively', 'GitHub operations', 'rebase', 'stash', 'bisect'. These are all terms users naturally use when working with git. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focusing on enhanced git operations with specific tools (lazygit, gh CLI, delta). The combination of GitHub-specific operations (PR, issues) and advanced git features (bisect, rebase) creates a distinct profile unlikely to conflict with basic git skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted reference skill that efficiently documents git tooling without unnecessary explanation. The content excels at actionability with executable commands and good progressive disclosure to reference files. The main weakness is the lack of explicit workflow sequences with validation steps for complex operations like rebasing or conflict resolution.
Suggestions
Add a workflow example for a common multi-step operation (e.g., interactive rebase) with explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery guidance
Include a brief troubleshooting section or validation step for destructive operations like force-pushing after rebase
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, presenting commands and key bindings without explaining what git, PRs, or diffs are. Every section delivers actionable information without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands throughout with specific flags and options. The lazygit key bindings, gh commands, and delta usage are all copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Commands are well-organized by tool/task but lacks explicit multi-step workflows with validation checkpoints. For operations like rebasing or PR merging, there's no guidance on verification steps or error recovery. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview structure with well-organized sections and explicit one-level-deep references to detailed patterns in the references directory. Navigation is straightforward with clear signaling. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- NeverSight/skills_feed
- Commit
5342bca
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.