Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and largely actionable, but suffers from duplicated routing content, a non-executable Task invocation block, a missing test-validation feedback loop, and broken reference files that do not exist on disk.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step in Step 6: run the generated tests, and on failure fix and re-run before reporting success, to close the feedback loop for this batch operation.
De-duplicate expert routing — keep it in either the architecture diagram, the Step 4 table, or the 'Expert Routing Details' section rather than repeating it three times.
Replace the descriptive Task-tool block with a concrete invocation example, and either create the referenced frameworks.md and visual-testing.md or remove the dead references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient via diagrams and tables, but expert routing is duplicated across the architecture diagram, the Step 4 table, and the 'Expert Routing Details' section, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable bash commands (rg, fd, jq, test), but the Step 4 Task-tool invocation is descriptive/pseudocode ('Task tool with subagent_type... Prompt includes') rather than a copy-paste ready call. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence exists, but this batch operation (generating test files, auto-creating tasks) lacks an explicit run-tests validation checkpoint with a fix/re-run feedback loop, capping the score per the batch-operation guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and a 'Reference Files' section signals one-level-deep references, but the cited frameworks.md and visual-testing.md do not exist in any bundle directory, so the references are broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |