zig-best-practices
Provides Zig patterns for type-first development with tagged unions, explicit error sets, comptime validation, and memory management. Must use when reading or writing Zig files.
90
Quality
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
94%
1.13xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly identifies its purpose (Zig language patterns) with specific technical capabilities and an explicit 'when to use' clause. The main weakness is limited trigger term coverage - while 'Zig files' is clear, it could benefit from additional natural variations users might say.
Suggestions
Add file extension trigger '.zig' and common variations like 'zig code', 'zig programming' to improve discoverability
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'tagged unions, explicit error sets, comptime validation, and memory management' - these are concrete Zig language features and patterns, not vague abstractions. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Provides Zig patterns for type-first development with tagged unions, explicit error sets, comptime validation, and memory management') AND when ('Must use when reading or writing Zig files') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Zig' and 'Zig files' as natural keywords, but missing common variations like '.zig', 'zig programming', 'zig code', or specific use cases users might mention like 'allocator', 'defer', or 'build.zig'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very clear niche targeting Zig specifically - unlikely to conflict with other language skills due to explicit 'Zig files' trigger and Zig-specific terminology like 'comptime', 'tagged unions', and 'explicit error sets'. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality Zig skill file that excels at providing concrete, executable patterns for type-first development. The content is appropriately concise, assumes Claude's competence, and provides excellent code examples with good/bad comparisons. The main weakness is that workflow clarity could be improved with more explicit validation checkpoints for multi-step operations.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the configuration loading example (e.g., validate all config before proceeding, log loaded values for debugging)
Consider adding a brief workflow section for common multi-step operations like 'setting up a new Zig project' or 'debugging a memory leak' with numbered steps and validation points
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence with Zig. No unnecessary explanations of basic concepts; every section provides actionable patterns with minimal preamble. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent executable code examples throughout. Every pattern includes copy-paste ready Zig code with clear good/bad comparisons. Function signatures, error handling, and memory management all have concrete implementations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The type-first development workflow has clear steps (1-4), but most sections are pattern catalogs rather than workflows. Missing explicit validation checkpoints for multi-step processes like configuration loading or resource management. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections. Advanced topics appropriately reference external files (GENERICS.md, C-INTEROP.md, DEBUGGING.md) with one-level-deep navigation. External references section provides official documentation links. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- NeverSight/skills_feed
- Commit
5342bca
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.