Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-sequenced with a strong verification checkpoint and lean, competence-assuming prose, but it is undermined by missing bundle files: the per-platform install and configure code that the skill defers to platforms/*.md is absent, weakening both actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced platforms/{ios,android,kmp,flutter,react-native}.md files — the body defers all install commands and Purchases.configure snippets to them, so without them the core app-side steps are not executable.
Either inline a minimal Purchases.configure snippet per platform in Section 3c or confirm the platform files exist before pointing to them, so actionability does not depend on absent references.
Deduplicate the public-vs-secret-key safety note (currently in both 2c and 3b) to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes competence — no re-explanation of what RevenueCat or an SDK is — with every section earning its place; held below 5 by mild redundancy (the public-vs-secret-key safety point repeats in 2c and 3b) and the fairly long console-navigation detail in 5b. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP calls with parameters, exact detection file-patterns, and exact build/verify commands are present, but the core per-platform install commands and Purchases.configure snippets are delegated to platforms/*.md files that do not exist in the bundle, leaving the key executable detail missing; this is the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete, missing key details' anchor rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-section sequence (understand → dashboard → app → verify → next steps) with an explicit validation checkpoint in Section 4 ('Do not claim setup is complete until…') and error-feedback signals (wrong key surfaces as an auth-error log); matches the top anchor for sequenced steps with explicit validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section 3c clearly signals one-level-deep references to five platform files, which would score higher, but per the judging guideline this is scored against the actual bundle — none of the referenced platforms/*.md files (nor references/, scripts/, assets/) exist, so the overview points to details that are absent and navigation is broken; below the 'good structure, minor gaps' level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |