Conciseness

The Overview repeats the frontmatter description nearly verbatim, and the 'Debounce Time', 'Event Listeners', and 'Turbo Permanent' subsections restate facts already given in Key Features and the code. There is also inferred-for-Claude padding ('too short = excessive requests, too long = lost changes'), matching the mostly-efficient-with-some-unnecessary-explanation anchor rather than the minor-trimming anchor.

Actionability

The body provides a complete, executable Stimulus controller, an exact Slim view snippet with required data attributes, a full RSpec helper with its file path, and two runnable system specs — copy-paste ready and covering the common cases including debounce behavior. This matches the fully-executable top anchor.

Workflow Clarity

Sections are clearly sequenced (controller → view integration → testing) and the Common Issues section gives check-then-fix recovery loops, with the testing section supplying the verification checkpoint (countValue polling). It falls short of the top anchor because steps are not explicitly ordered with validate-before-proceed checkpoints and one 'Related Patterns' bullet ('Stimulus Values') is under-specified.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well organized with clear section headers, and the References section points to one-level-deep external URLs that are clearly signaled. However, the skill is well over 50 lines with no bundle files — the full controller, helper, and spec code are inlined where a reference file could carry them — so it is good-but-not-optimally split rather than a clear overview with well-signaled file references.

Specificity

The description names the domain and one concrete action ('Automatic form submission after user input changes using a debounce mechanism'), but does not list several specific actions; 'Creates a seamless auto-save experience' is generic phrasing. It fits the anchor for domain plus 1-2 concrete actions rather than the several-actions anchor above.

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (automatic submission after changes with debounce), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance — applicability is only weakly implied by 'for forms with rich text editors or multiple fields'. Per the rubric, a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3; it is not 2 because the 'what' is fully concrete.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like 'auto-save', 'form submission', 'debounce', 'rich text editors', and 'multiple fields' give good keyword coverage a user would plausibly say. It falls short of the comprehensive anchor because synonyms such as 'autosave', 'draft saving', or explicit trigger phrasing are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Auto-save', 'debounce', and 'rich text editors' carve a clear niche unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Minor overlap risk remains with generic form-handling or form-validation skills, so it is mostly distinct rather than fully minimal-conflict.