Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content with real, well-organized one-level-deep references and concrete examples. It loses points for a redundant Quick Reference section and the absence of an explicit verification checkpoint in the component-creation workflow.
Suggestions
Remove or slim the Quick Reference section, which duplicates the Finding Optics Classes, Using Optics Tokens, and Creating Components workflows already stated in full above.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the component-creation workflow, e.g. "Confirm the class does not already exist in assets/components.json before creating" and "Re-import in application.scss and verify it compiles".
Trim one of the two full component examples (Card or Button) to a shorter illustrative snippet to reduce token usage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with token lists, violation patterns, and executable examples, but the Quick Reference section restates the discovery/token/component workflows already covered above and two full component examples add length that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready CSS for Card and Button components, exact token names, specific file paths, and concrete violation patterns — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Discovery and token workflows are clearly sequenced, but component creation lacks an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g., confirm the class isn't already in components.json or rebuild/re-check), leaving the sequence without a verification step. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to assets/components.json and assets/tokens.json are real, one level deep, and clearly signaled; the large token/component catalogs are correctly externalized while illustrative examples stay inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |