Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is concise and well-structured with appropriate progressive disclosure to external resources. However, it lacks concrete examples of API call parameters (e.g., the exact search query format) and validation/error handling steps for a multi-step workflow involving external API calls.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example of the search query format for `toolbase_github_search_issues` including date range calculation
Include error handling guidance for cases like API failures, rate limits, or no PRs found
Remove the duplicate '可用资源' section at the end
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations. Each step is brief and assumes Claude understands GitHub APIs and PR concepts. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific tool names and classification rules, but lacks concrete code examples or exact API call parameters. The search query format and date calculation are not shown. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (1-4), but lacks validation checkpoints. No guidance on handling API errors, empty results, or what to do if PR classification is ambiguous. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with clear overview and well-signaled references to external files (classification-rules.md, weekly-template.md). One-level deep references are appropriately used. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |