Straightforward text extraction from document files (text-based PDF only for now, no OCR or docx). Use when you just need to read/extract text from binary documents.
84
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
2.04xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./read-bin-docs/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid, focused description that clearly communicates its narrow scope and when to use it. The explicit limitations (no OCR, no docx) are a strength for distinctiveness. It could benefit from slightly more specific trigger terms and listing additional concrete actions beyond basic text extraction.
Suggestions
Add more natural trigger term variations such as '.pdf', 'parse PDF', 'get text from PDF', 'read PDF content' to improve keyword coverage.
Consider listing more specific actions if applicable (e.g., 'extract text, read page content, retrieve paragraphs from text-based PDF files') to strengthen specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (text extraction from documents) and specifies a key constraint (text-based PDF only, no OCR or docx), but only describes one action (extract text) rather than listing multiple concrete capabilities. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (straightforward text extraction from text-based PDFs) and 'when' ('Use when you just need to read/extract text from binary documents'), with explicit scope limitations (no OCR, no docx). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some natural terms like 'text extraction', 'PDF', 'read', 'extract text', and 'binary documents', but misses common user variations like '.pdf', 'get text from', 'parse PDF', or 'read PDF content'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The explicit constraints (text-based PDF only, no OCR, no docx) and the narrow scope (just text extraction, not analysis or manipulation) make this clearly distinguishable from broader document processing or PDF manipulation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A solid, actionable skill with executable code examples and clear CLI usage. The main weakness is redundancy between the Quick Start and Basic Usage sections, which wastes tokens without adding value. The skill is well-suited for its simple purpose but could be tightened by eliminating duplicate code blocks and unnecessary commentary.
Suggestions
Remove the 'Basic Usage' section or merge it with Quick Start — the code is nearly identical and wastes tokens.
Remove the 'Future: Support for DOCX...' line as it provides no actionable guidance and will become stale.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient but has redundancy — the basic usage section repeats the quick start code almost identically, and some explanations like 'Works with most text-based PDFs' and the future plans note are unnecessary filler. The common issues section adds modest value but could be tighter. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste ready Python code and CLI commands with concrete examples for different use cases (all pages, specific pages, output to file). The script usage examples with flags are specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose skill (text extraction) with no destructive or batch operations requiring validation checkpoints. The single task is unambiguous with clear code examples, and the common issues section provides basic troubleshooting guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is reasonably structured with sections progressing from quick start to advanced usage and troubleshooting. However, the basic usage section largely duplicates the quick start, and the content could benefit from clearer separation — the script reference could point to the actual script file rather than re-documenting its CLI interface inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
aed1afb
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.