Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable instruction sheet: a single unambiguous command path, concrete examples, and per-provider requirements without padding. Its main gaps are an implicit rather than explicit workflow order (when to verify, what to do on failure or with the resulting artifact) and a couple of redundant or dangling lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept explanations), but there is minor redundancy — the rationale "The `omc ask` wrapper handles correct flag selection, artifact persistence, and provider-version compatibility automatically" restates the preceding prohibition, and the trailing "Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}" line adds noise. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and mostly copy-paste ready (`omc ask {{ARGUMENTS}}`, version-check commands, six usage examples, artifact path), but there is no guidance on what to do with the artifact after it is written, and the `--agent-prompt` flag appears in an example without explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The execution path is unambiguous ("Required execution path — always use this command") with availability checks listed, but the sequence is implicit across sections rather than explicit: it never says when to run the version checks (before invoking, or only on failure?) or what to do if a provider is unavailable. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short, single-purpose skill with no bundle files; content stays in one well-organized page with clear sections (Usage, Routing, Requirements, Artifacts) and the only external pointer (Antigravity install instructions) is a clearly signaled link, fitting the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |