CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

docker-compose-generator

Generate multi-service Docker Compose files with common stacks (app + DB + Redis + Nginx), volumes, networks, healthchecks, depends_on, environment variables, and profiles.

79

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./infrastructure/docker-compose-generator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description excels at specificity with comprehensive technical details about Docker Compose capabilities and components. However, it lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') which limits Claude's ability to know when to select this skill. Adding natural user language variations would improve discoverability.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios like 'Use when the user asks to create docker-compose.yml files, set up containerized applications, or configure multi-container environments'

Include common user phrases and file extensions like 'docker-compose.yml', 'containerize', 'container setup', or 'microservices deployment'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and components: 'multi-service Docker Compose files', 'common stacks (app + DB + Redis + Nginx)', 'volumes, networks, healthchecks, depends_on, environment variables, and profiles'.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what does this do' with detailed capabilities, but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant technical terms like 'Docker Compose', 'Redis', 'Nginx', 'healthchecks', but missing common user variations like 'docker-compose.yml', 'containerization', 'container orchestration', or simpler terms users might say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Very specific niche focused on Docker Compose with detailed component list; unlikely to conflict with general Docker skills or other infrastructure tools due to the explicit multi-service and stack focus.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Implementation

79%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, actionable skill with excellent concrete examples and efficient token usage. The YAML configurations are production-ready with proper healthchecks, networks, and environment variable patterns. However, it lacks explicit validation workflows (e.g., validating compose files before running) and could benefit from better progressive disclosure by moving database variants to a separate reference file.

Suggestions

Add a validation step before running compose: 'docker compose config' to validate YAML syntax and variable interpolation

Include troubleshooting guidance for common failures (healthcheck failures, port conflicts, volume permission issues)

Consider moving database variants (MySQL, MongoDB) to a separate DATABASES.md reference file to reduce main file length

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient, providing only necessary information without explaining basic Docker concepts. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary explanations.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste ready YAML configurations and bash commands. The examples are complete with proper syntax, environment variable handling, healthchecks, and all necessary configuration details.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

While the structure is logical and commands are well-organized, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops. Missing verification steps like 'docker compose config' to validate YAML before running, or troubleshooting guidance when services fail healthchecks.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear sections, but the file is quite long (~200 lines of YAML examples). The Integration Notes reference other skills but the main content could benefit from splitting database variants and optional patterns into separate reference files.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
achreftlili/deep-dev-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.