CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

litestar-project-starter

Scaffold a production-ready Litestar 2.x application with class-based controllers, DTOs, guards, SQLAlchemy plugin, and auto-generated OpenAPI docs.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./backend-python/litestar-project-starter/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, executable scaffold with excellent actionability and clean section structure; the main gaps are minor duplication and the absence of explicit migration validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicated 'internal_server_error_handler' definition — keep it only in main.py and reference it from the Exception Handler section.

Add a validation step after migrations (e.g. 'alembic check' or 'verify tables exist') before starting the dev server in 'First Steps'.

De-duplicate the venv/install instructions shared between 'First Steps After Scaffold' and 'Common Commands'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly code-dense and efficient with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the exception handler is duplicated verbatim across two sections and 'First Steps' overlaps 'Common Commands'.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready code for config, ORM, DTOs, service/repository, guard, controllers, plugin, middleware, app factory, and tests, plus concrete shell commands.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

'First Steps After Scaffold' gives a clear 6-step sequence ending in a verification ('curl …/schema/swagger'), but database-migration steps lack explicit validation checkpoints.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections (Scaffold Command, Project Structure, Key Conventions, Essential Patterns, First Steps, Common Commands, Integration Notes) with no nested references, though all boilerplate is inlined rather than split into bundle files.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description that names concrete components and a distinct framework, but it omits an explicit 'Use when…' trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when scaffolding a new Litestar 2.x backend or when the user asks to set up a Litestar project/API.'

Include natural trigger synonyms such as 'Litestar project', 'Litestar API', or 'Litestar app' to broaden keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete components — 'class-based controllers, DTOs, guards, SQLAlchemy plugin, and auto-generated OpenAPI docs' — giving comprehensive coverage of what the scaffold produces.

5 / 5

Completeness

Has a clear 'what' (scaffold a production-ready Litestar app) but no explicit 'Use when…' trigger clause, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Names the framework ('Litestar 2.x application') and the natural architectural vocabulary (controllers, DTOs, guards, SQLAlchemy, OpenAPI) a user would say, but lacks synonyms/variations like 'Litestar project' or 'Litestar API'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clearly distinct niche — Litestar 2.x scaffolding with named components — so it is unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
achreftlili/deep-dev-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.