Scaffold a TypeORM 0.3+ project with TypeScript, entities with decorators, CLI migrations, repositories, DataSource configuration, relations, query builder, and subscribers.
79
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./database/typeorm-starter/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description excels at specificity and distinctiveness by naming concrete TypeORM 0.3+ features and concepts. However, it lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') and could benefit from more natural user-facing keywords beyond technical jargon. The description assumes users already know they want TypeORM rather than helping Claude identify when this skill applies.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios like 'Use when setting up a new TypeORM project, configuring database connections, or when the user mentions TypeORM, ORM setup, or database entities'
Include more natural user terms like 'database setup', 'ORM', 'Node.js database', 'PostgreSQL/MySQL with TypeScript' to capture users who may not explicitly say 'TypeORM'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: scaffold project, entities with decorators, CLI migrations, repositories, DataSource configuration, relations, query builder, and subscribers. These are all concrete TypeORM concepts. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers 'what' with comprehensive capability list, but lacks explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance. Users would need to infer when to use this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant technical terms like 'TypeORM', 'TypeScript', 'entities', 'migrations', 'repositories', but missing common user variations like 'ORM', 'database setup', 'Node.js database', or file extensions. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific to TypeORM 0.3+ with distinct terminology (DataSource, decorators, query builder). Unlikely to conflict with other database or ORM skills due to explicit version and framework naming. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
79%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality TypeORM starter skill with excellent actionability and conciseness. The code examples are comprehensive, executable, and cover all major TypeORM patterns. The main weaknesses are the lack of explicit validation checkpoints in workflows (especially around migrations) and the monolithic structure that could benefit from progressive disclosure to separate files.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps to the migration workflow, e.g., 'Run migration:show to verify pending migrations before running, then verify again after to confirm success'
Consider splitting detailed entity examples and query builder patterns into a separate PATTERNS.md or EXAMPLES.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with references
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, providing only essential information without explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary context. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste ready code examples throughout - from DataSource configuration to entities, repositories, subscribers, and transactions. All code is complete TypeScript with proper imports and types. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Commands are listed clearly but lack explicit validation checkpoints. The migration workflow doesn't include verification steps (e.g., checking migration status after running, validating schema changes). The warning about synchronize in production is good but feedback loops are missing. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but it's a monolithic file with ~250 lines of code examples that could benefit from splitting into separate reference files. The Integration Notes mention other skills but the main content could be better structured with external references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
181fcbc
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.