CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

frontend-ui-engineering

Builds production-quality, accessible, responsive user-facing UIs. Use when building or modifying interfaces and pages, creating components, implementing layouts, meeting WCAG accessibility requirements, managing state, or when the output needs to look and feel production-quality rather than AI-generated.

69

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable, example-rich content with strong structure and a verification checklist, but it carries reusable verbosity and inlines reference-grade material that would better live in separate files. A small bundle referenced file for the accessibility checklist would also lift progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Trim explanations of widely-known concepts (e.g., the prose around the heading hierarchy, the 'Common Rationalizations' table restating that accessibility is a legal requirement) to lift conciseness.

Move the detailed accessibility section and design-system tables into a reference file under references/ and link to it one level deep, instead of inlining everything in SKILL.md.

Add an explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop (e.g., 'run axe-core; if violations found, fix and re-run') into the build workflow rather than only a terminal checklist.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with many high-value code examples and tables, but several sections restate widely-known concepts (e.g., defining the type hierarchy, restating that accessibility is 'a legal requirement', explaining prop drilling) that Claude already knows and could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Abundant copy-paste-ready, executable code and concrete examples spanning composition, containers, accessibility patterns, skeletons, and optimistic updates, with specific commands and Tailwind/ARIA snippets that cover the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear topical sequencing and a strong verification checklist with checkboxes, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop in the build workflow; the checklist is a terminal check rather than an inline recovery loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized with clear section headers and a See Also pointer to a referenced checklist, but the body inlines a large amount of material (full accessibility guide, design-system tables) that could live in separate reference files, and the referenced path targets no actual bundle file.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, concise description that explicitly answers what the skill does and when to use it with concrete trigger terms and multiple specific capabilities. Minor overlap risk with generic frontend skills keeps distinctiveness just below a 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'building or modifying interfaces and pages, creating components, implementing layouts, meeting WCAG accessibility requirements, managing state' — covering the skill comprehensively.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what it does in the first sentence and follows with an explicit 'Use when...' clause enumerating concrete trigger scenarios, satisfying both what and when.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Rich natural trigger terms users would say ('interfaces and pages', 'components', 'layouts', 'WCAG', 'state') plus the explicit framing 'look and feel production-quality rather than AI-generated', giving comprehensive keyword coverage.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The production-quality / accessibility / anti-AI-aesthetic niche is fairly distinct, but the broad 'building or modifying interfaces' framing overlaps somewhat with general frontend skills.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
addyosmani/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.