Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, highly actionable AEM playbook: exact paths, decision tables, copy-paste snippets, and a strong configuration gate with user feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are repetition of the configuration gate and the absence of an explicit build/test verification step after file creation.
Suggestions
State the configuration gate once (the Step 0 section) and have the top gate-check section and the Reference Files table simply point to it, removing the five-bullet 'Why you should not explore' rationale that restates one point.
Add a final verification step to the workflow (e.g. compile core module / run the generated unit tests, or instruct to trigger a build) so file creation closes with a feedback loop rather than an open offer.
Fix the formatting where bold markers run lines together ('Load: references/htl-patterns.md**If Figma URL provided, ALSO load:**' and the mis-numbered '1./1./2.' list under Figma URL parsing) so instructions render as intended.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean, table-driven, AEM-specific knowledge Claude does not already have (paths, granite resource types, Core Component mapping). However, the configuration gate is stated three times (gate-check section, Step 0, and the Reference Files table) and the 'Why you should not explore the codebase when unconfigured' section repeats one rationale as five bullets, so a trim is possible — fits anchor 4, not 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact file paths (e.g. 'ui.apps/src/main/content/jcr_root/apps/[project]/components/{component-name}/.content.xml'), a granite resource-type mapping table, the exact MCP tool-call JSON for get_design_context, a ready-to-display configuration error message, and a concrete delegation-pattern code snippet. Minor formatting glitches (run-together bold on the 3.3/3.7 'ALSO load' lines) do not hurt executability. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 0→4 sequence with a hard validation gate ('Check: Does the file exist and does it have configured: true?' → stop and wait for user), a dialog-spec confirmation checkpoint ('Echo back EXACTLY what you understood… Is this correct?'), and Step 3.11 dependency verification. Between 4 and 5: recovery loops exist for configuration and spec mismatches, but there is no explicit post-creation build/test verification of generated files (only an offer to build), so a minor validation gap remains. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Verified against the actual bundle: every file cited in the body (15 references/*.md plus assets/field-type-mappings.md) exists on disk, references are one level deep (reference files cross-link only to siblings, no nested chains), inline 'Load:' cues appear at point of use, and a consolidated task→reference table at the end provides navigation. Matches the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |