Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands and a clear phased structure, losing points only on minor verbosity and uneven validation checkpoints across the later phases.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated description line after the frontmatter and tighten prose like the hooks comparison paragraph to improve token efficiency.
Add explicit stop/fix checkpoints to the lint, security, and diff phases so every phase has a clear validation gate, lifting workflow clarity.
Define explicit pass/fail thresholds (e.g. the implied 80% coverage) inline per phase so the verdict criteria are unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and command-focused, but it repeats the frontmatter description verbatim and includes some soft prose ('This skill complements PostToolUse hooks...') that could be trimmed, so it is efficient but not maximally tight. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (e.g. 'npm run build 2>&1 | tail -20', 'npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -30', 'git diff --stat') matching the fully-executable score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six phases give a clear sequence with one explicit checkpoint ('If build fails, STOP and fix before continuing') and a final report, but later phases (lint, security, diff) lack explicit validation or feedback-loop checkpoints, leaving gaps as the score-2 anchor describes. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a single self-contained document organized into clear, well-labeled sections with no nested references, so organization is appropriate and navigation is easy per the simple-skill scoring note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |