anatomy-quiz-master

Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.

Quality

46%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/anatomy-quiz-master/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

38%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content offers genuinely useful anatomy material (regions table, clinical scenario, parameters) but is weighed down by generic process boilerplate and references to scripts/reference files that do not exist in the bundle. Executability and navigation suffer from these dead references.

Suggestions

Either add the missing scripts (quiz_generator.py, adaptive_engine.py, etc.) and reference files to the bundle, or remove the code examples and file listings that reference them so guidance matches the actual bundle.

Trim the generic process sections (Implementation Details, Output Requirements, Input Validation, Response Template) that restate standard practice Claude already knows.

Move the large regions table and clinical-scenario example into a reference file and link to it one level deep, keeping SKILL.md a concise overview.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is noticeably padded with generic process boilerplate ('Structured execution path...', 'Output discipline: keep results reproducible...', Response Template, Input Validation) that restates what Claude already knows rather than anatomy-specific guidance.	2 / 5
Actionability	Concrete code examples and a CLI parameter table are present, but the Python examples import modules (quiz_generator, adaptive) that do not exist in the scripts/ bundle (only main.py is present), so the examples are not actually executable as written.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A 5-step Workflow and a py_compile Quick Check provide a rough sequence with one validation checkpoint, but the steps are generic and not anatomy-specific, with checkpoints otherwise implicit.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body lists 6 reference files and 8 scripts, but the actual bundle contains only references/guidelines.md (not referenced in the body) and scripts/main.py, so most signaled references are dead and large tables/scenarios are inlined rather than split out.	2 / 5
	Total	10 / 20 Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear domain and one concrete action but is cut off mid-sentence ('with multiple.') and omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance. It is distinct enough to avoid most conflicts but incomplete as a trigger description.

Suggestions

Complete the truncated description — replace 'with multiple.' with the intended phrase (e.g., 'with multiple question types and adaptive difficulty').

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers a user would say (e.g., 'Use when preparing for USMLE anatomy, reviewing regional anatomy, or generating quiz questions').

Include natural synonyms and extensions (neuroanatomy, clinical correlation, flashcards) to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('anatomy quizzes for medical education') and one concrete action ('Generate interactive anatomy quizzes'), but the sentence is truncated at 'with multiple.' leaving the capability list incomplete.	3 / 5
Completeness	Has a clear 'what' (generate anatomy quizzes) but no 'when' / 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3; the truncation further weakens the 'what'.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Contains relevant natural terms like 'anatomy quizzes' and 'medical education' that a user might say, but lacks synonyms or variations (e.g., USMLE, flashcards, neuroanatomy).	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	'Anatomy quizzes for medical education' is a clear niche with distinct triggers and only minor overlap risk with general medical-education skills, though the truncated ending slightly blurs it.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Path: scientific-skills/Academic Writing/anatomy-quiz-master/SKILL.md
Commit: 63c61d3

Reviewed: 2 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.