CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

dpi-upscaler-checker

Check image DPI and intelligently upscale low-resolution images using super-resolution

71

2.20x

Quality

57%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

2.20x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./scientific-skills/Data analysis/dpi-upscaler-checker/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly articulates specific technical capabilities (DPI checking and super-resolution upscaling) and occupies a distinct niche. However, it critically lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') which would help Claude know when to select this skill, and could benefit from more natural user-facing keywords like 'enhance' or 'blurry'.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to check image resolution, upscale images, or mentions DPI, blurry images, or low quality photos.'

Include natural user terms like 'enhance', 'enlarge', 'blurry', 'pixelated', 'image quality', 'make bigger', or common file extensions (.jpg, .png, .webp).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists specific concrete actions: 'Check image DPI' and 'intelligently upscale low-resolution images using super-resolution'. These are clear, actionable capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like 'DPI', 'upscale', 'low-resolution', 'super-resolution', and 'images', but missing common user variations like 'enhance', 'enlarge', 'blurry', 'pixelated', 'image quality', or file extensions like '.jpg', '.png'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche focused on DPI checking and super-resolution upscaling - distinct from general image editing or other image processing skills. The combination of DPI + upscaling creates a specific use case.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides good actionable commands with clear parameter documentation and output schemas. However, it's bloated with boilerplate sections (security checklists, lifecycle status, evaluation criteria) that don't help Claude execute the task. The workflow could be improved with explicit check-then-fix sequences and validation steps.

Suggestions

Remove boilerplate sections (Security Checklist, Evaluation Criteria, Lifecycle Status, Risk Assessment) that don't provide actionable guidance for using the tool

Add an explicit workflow showing the common pattern: check DPI → review report → upscale images below threshold → verify results meet 300 DPI

Consolidate Features and Use Cases into the introduction or remove them - Claude doesn't need marketing copy

Add a validation step after upscaling to confirm the output meets the target DPI requirement

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill includes some unnecessary sections like 'Features', 'Use Cases', 'Evaluation Criteria', 'Lifecycle Status', and 'Security Checklist' that add bulk without providing actionable guidance. The core usage examples are reasonably concise, but the document could be significantly tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable bash commands with clear parameter tables. The usage examples are copy-paste ready with concrete input/output paths and flags. The JSON output schema is explicit and helpful.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Commands are listed but there's no explicit workflow for common multi-step scenarios (e.g., check DPI → identify failures → upscale only those). Missing validation checkpoints - no guidance on verifying upscaled images meet the target DPI or handling failures.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but everything is in one monolithic file. The parameter tables and algorithm descriptions could be split into separate reference files. No external file references for advanced topics.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.