CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

positions

Position management with stop-loss, take-profit, and trailing stops

59

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/skills/bundled/positions/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and token-efficient, with comprehensive executable examples. Its weaknesses are structural: an entire API reference is inlined in SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure, and the risky stop-order operations lack validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Split the TypeScript API reference into a separate file (e.g. references/API.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview pointing to it, raising progressive_disclosure.

Add an explicit validation/recovery step after setting stops (e.g. verify the stop was accepted via positions.get() and retry/inspect on failure) to raise workflow_clarity above 3.

Add a short "Common workflow" sequenced section (create manager → start → set stops → confirm → listen for events) with checkpoints to make the intended process explicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is almost entirely code, command tables, and brief best-practice bullets with no concept explanations or library comparisons; inline comments are genuinely useful rather than padded, leaving only minor trim opportunities.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready TypeScript snippets and chat commands covering the common cases (set/remove stops, partial exits, multiple levels, event handlers, summary), all executable.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

It is reference-style with only an implicit create→start→set-stops→listen ordering and no explicit validation checkpoints for the financially risky act of placing/modifying stop orders, which caps workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The file is titled a "Complete API Reference" and inlines ~200 lines of API documentation that belong in a separate reference file; section headers give structure but no external references exist to offload detail.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and uses natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit "when to use" guidance, which limits its completeness. It is clearly niche-targeted with low conflict risk.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when managing open positions or when the user mentions stop-loss, take-profit, or trailing stops."

Include a couple of synonyms/variations users might say (e.g. "trailing stop-loss", "auto-exit") to broaden trigger coverage toward a 5.

Consider mentioning the supported platforms (e.g. Polymarket, futures) in the description to sharpen distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("Position management") plus three concrete order types ("stop-loss, take-profit, and trailing stops"), listing several specific capabilities rather than vague abstraction.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (position management with three stop types) but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trading terms a user would actually say ("stop-loss", "take-profit", "trailing stops", "positions") with good coverage, though a few synonyms/variations are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of stop-loss, take-profit, and trailing stops marks a clear trading niche that is mostly distinct from sibling skills, with only minor overlap risk against a generic trading skill.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

alsk1992/CloddsBot

Path

src/skills/bundled/positions/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.